Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022 Apr 1;35(4):195-201. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000822628.82131.1d.
To present the results of a research study evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) compared with that of Doppler arterial waveforms (DAWs) to detect peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After completing this continuing education activity, the participant will:1. Summarize the evidence the authors considered when comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the ABPI with that of Doppler arterial waveforms to detect PAD.2. Select the characteristics of the participants in the studies the authors analyzed.3. Identify the results of the authors' study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the ABPI with that of Doppler arterial waveforms to detect PAD.4. Distinguish the authors' conclusions about the advantages of using Doppler arterial waveforms to detect PAD.
介绍一项研究的结果,评估踝臂血压指数 (ABPI) 与多普勒动脉波形 (DAWs) 检测外周动脉疾病 (PAD) 的诊断准确性。
本继续教育活动面向对皮肤和伤口护理感兴趣的医生、医师助理、执业护士和护士。
学习目标/结果:完成本继续教育活动后,参与者将:1. 总结作者在比较 ABPI 和多普勒动脉波形检测 PAD 的诊断准确性时考虑的证据。2. 选择作者分析的研究中参与者的特征。3. 确定作者比较 ABPI 和多普勒动脉波形检测 PAD 的诊断准确性的研究结果。4. 区分作者关于使用多普勒动脉波形检测 PAD 的优势的结论。