Amog Krystle, Pham Ba', Courvoisier Melissa, Mak Megan, Booth Andrew, Godfrey Christina, Hwee Jeremiah, Straus Sharon E, Tricco Andrea C
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;147:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
To develop a web-based decision support tool that guides users through a series of simple questions for recommending knowledge synthesis methods suitable for their research question.
We used findings from previous work to structure a set of questions along key dimensions of different knowledge synthesis methods. We developed the tool using four steps: (1) designing the tool, (2) conducting usability testing, (3) disseminating the tool, and (4) evaluating its real-world use. Steps 1-3 were conducted iteratively, and the tool was evaluated using the RE-AIM framework.
The "Right Review" tool separates quantitative reviews and qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). Five questions are asked to select from among 26 methods for quantitative reviews, and 10 questions to select methods from among 15 QES. Conduct/reporting guidance and open-access examples are provided for each recommended method. The tool was disseminated to >4,600 users worldwide within 12 months. Evaluation results showed that the tool was fit-for-purpose and easy to use.
The proliferation of knowledge synthesis methods makes it challenging for reviewers to select the "right" method. "Right Review" is a free, practical decision support tool that helps reviewers choose an appropriate method from 41 alternatives.
开发一个基于网络的决策支持工具,通过一系列简单问题引导用户推荐适合其研究问题的知识综合方法。
我们利用先前工作的结果,沿着不同知识综合方法的关键维度构建了一组问题。我们分四个步骤开发该工具:(1)设计工具,(2)进行可用性测试,(3)推广工具,(4)评估其实际使用情况。步骤1至3反复进行,并使用RE-AIM框架对工具进行评估。
“正确综述”工具将定量综述和定性证据综合(QES)区分开来。针对定量综述从26种方法中进行选择时提出5个问题,针对QES从15种方法中进行选择时提出10个问题。为每种推荐方法提供了实施/报告指南和开放获取示例。该工具在12个月内传播到全球4600多名用户。评估结果表明该工具符合目的且易于使用。
知识综合方法的激增使得综述撰写者难以选择“正确”的方法。“正确综述”是一个免费、实用的决策支持工具,可帮助综述撰写者从41种备选方法中选择合适的方法。