Goudarzi Zahra, Nikfar Shekoufeh, Kebriaeezadeh Abbas, Yousefi Zenouz Reza, Abdollahi Asl Akbar, Tavakoli Nader
Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Human Resources Research Centre, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Oct 26;35:141. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.141. eCollection 2021.
Investing in the R & D sector of new medical technologies is associated with the risk of being rejected by paying organizations because of the lack of value-for-money. The purpose of this study is to investigate the different methods of evaluating the impacts of emerging medical technologies. Using scoping review method, we analyzed studies that investigated methods for assessing the impacts of emerging medical technologies on development. To find these studies, the Cochran Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, Embase, Ebsco and Pubmed databases from 2000 to 2018 were searched. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the STROBE Checklist. Two reviewers independently selected the qualified studies. Charting and collating the data were used based on the method proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. Overall, 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen methods were identified and put in five distinct categories: forecasting, Pro-HTA, Early-HTA, priority setting, and HHS were found to measure the impact of emerging technologies. The quality of these studies was acceptable. Few studies were conducted on emerging pharmaceutical technologies, and they were mostly on emerging medical devices. The Early HTA methods were often used to measure the effects of pharmaceutical technologies and medical devices technologies. The Pro-HTA method used dynamic modeling to examine the impact of medical technologies on a broad range of dimensions, while the HTA and Early-HTA methods used cost-effectiveness techniques throughout the development process. The HHS method used a multivariate decision-making technique. Different methods were used to investigate the impacts of emerging medical technologies. Chronologically Pro-HTA methods are new ways for investigating emerging medical technologies beyond clinical and economic impacts. Assessing the feasibility of implementing Pro-HTA in real environments deserves further research.
投资于新医疗技术的研发领域存在因性价比不足而被付费机构拒绝的风险。本研究的目的是调查评估新兴医疗技术影响的不同方法。我们采用范围综述法,分析了调查新兴医疗技术对发展影响评估方法的研究。为找到这些研究,检索了2000年至2018年的考克兰图书馆、科学网、Embase、Ebsco和PubMed数据库。使用STROBE清单评估研究的方法学质量。两名评审员独立选择合格研究。根据Arksey和O'Malley提出的方法进行数据图表绘制和整理。总体而言,38项研究符合纳入标准。确定了16种方法并分为五个不同类别:预测、专业卫生技术评估(Pro-HTA)、早期卫生技术评估(Early-HTA)、优先级设定,发现卫生保健系统(HHS)可衡量新兴技术的影响。这些研究的质量是可接受的。关于新兴制药技术的研究较少,且大多针对新兴医疗设备。早期卫生技术评估方法常用于衡量制药技术和医疗设备技术的效果。专业卫生技术评估方法使用动态建模来考察医疗技术在广泛维度上的影响,而卫生技术评估和早期卫生技术评估方法在整个开发过程中使用成本效益技术。卫生保健系统方法使用多变量决策技术。采用不同方法调查新兴医疗技术的影响。按时间顺序,专业卫生技术评估方法是研究新兴医疗技术超越临床和经济影响的新途径。评估在实际环境中实施专业卫生技术评估的可行性值得进一步研究。