Lang Christin, Richardson Cele, Micic Gorica, Gradisar Michael
Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 11;13:785079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.785079. eCollection 2022.
Adolescents with a late chronotype are at greater risk for mood disorders, risk-taking behaviors, school absenteeism, and lower academic achievement. As there are multiple causes for late chronotype, the field lacks studies on the relationship between mood, circadian phase, and phase angle of entrainment in late chronotype adolescents. Three objectives guide this explorative study: (1) to describe sleep, circadian phase, and phase angle of entrainment in late chronotype adolescents, (2) to explore how different levels of lateness are associated with sleep quality, sleep propensity, and mood, and (3) to investigate the influence of circadian phase on bedtime choice and sleep duration.
Baseline data from 19 male adolescents (M = 16.4 ± 1.0 yrs), who were part of a larger intervention trial, were analyzed. Chronotype was measured with the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, circadian timing via dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), and sleep habits with a 7-day sleep log. Further questionnaires assessed daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, and mood. Evening sleepiness and sustained attention were used as a proxy for evening sleep propensity.
On school nights, sleep duration averaged 7.78 h (±1.65), and 9.00 h (±1.42) on weekend nights. Mean DLMO was observed at 23.13 h (± 1.65), with a weekend phase angle of entrainment of 2.48 h. Regression fittings revealed a tendency for shorter phase angles with delayed DLMOs. Further analysis with chronotype subgroups revealed that this was only true for light and moderate late types, whereas extreme late types showed wide phase angles. Even though daytime sleepiness and sleep duration did not differ between subgroups, mood and sleep quality declined as lateness increased. Extreme late chronotypes experienced higher evening sleepiness, while slight late chronotypes showed higher evening attention. Chronotype but not DLMO predicted bedtime on school- and particularly weekend-nights.
Our findings suggest that with increasing lateness, the likelihood of experiencing poor sleep quality and mood disorders increases. As DLMO did not predict bedtime, our data indicate that the factors contributing to a late chronotype are versatile and complex, particularly for extreme late types. Further studies involving a larger and gender-balanced sample are needed to confirm findings.
生物钟类型较晚的青少年患情绪障碍、冒险行为、缺课及学业成绩较低的风险更高。由于导致生物钟类型较晚的原因有多种,该领域缺乏关于生物钟类型较晚的青少年的情绪、昼夜节律相位和同步化相位角之间关系的研究。本探索性研究有三个目标:(1)描述生物钟类型较晚的青少年的睡眠、昼夜节律相位和同步化相位角;(2)探讨不同程度的晚睡如何与睡眠质量、睡眠倾向和情绪相关联;(3)研究昼夜节律相位对就寝时间选择和睡眠时间的影响。
分析了来自19名男性青少年(M = 16.4 ± 1.0岁)的基线数据,他们是一项更大规模干预试验的一部分。使用慕尼黑生物钟类型问卷测量生物钟类型,通过暗光褪黑素开始分泌时间(DLMO)测量昼夜节律时间,并使用7天睡眠日志记录睡眠习惯。进一步的问卷评估了白天嗜睡、睡眠质量和情绪。将夜间嗜睡和持续注意力用作夜间睡眠倾向的指标。
在上学日的晚上,平均睡眠时间为7.78小时(±1.65),周末晚上为9.00小时(±1.42)。平均DLMO时间为23.13小时(± 1.65),周末同步化相位角为2.48小时。回归拟合显示,随着DLMO延迟,相位角有缩短的趋势。对生物钟类型亚组的进一步分析表明,这仅适用于轻度和中度晚睡类型,而极端晚睡类型的相位角较宽。尽管各亚组之间白天嗜睡和睡眠时间没有差异,但随着晚睡程度增加,情绪和睡眠质量下降。极端晚睡类型的青少年夜间嗜睡程度更高,而轻度晚睡类型的青少年夜间注意力更高。生物钟类型而非DLMO可预测上学日尤其是周末晚上的就寝时间。
我们的研究结果表明,随着晚睡程度增加,睡眠质量差和情绪障碍的可能性增加。由于DLMO不能预测就寝时间,我们的数据表明,导致生物钟类型较晚的因素是多方面且复杂的,尤其是对于极端晚睡类型。需要进一步开展涉及更大规模且性别均衡样本的研究来证实这些发现。