Suppr超能文献

介绍医生如何为患者选择专家:系统评价。

How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.

机构信息

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3444-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician referrals are a critical step in directing patients to high-quality specialists. Despite efforts to encourage referrals to high-volume hospitals, many patients receive treatment at low-volume centers with worse outcomes. We aimed to determine the most important factors considered by referring providers when selecting specialists for their patients through a systematic review of medical and surgical literature.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from January 2000 to July 2021 using terms related to referrals, specialty, surgery, primary care, and decision-making. We included survey and interview studies reporting the factors considered by healthcare providers as they refer patients to specialists in the USA. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist. A qualitative thematic analysis was performed to synthesize common decision factors across studies.

RESULTS

We screened 1,972 abstracts and identified 7 studies for inclusion, reporting on 1,575 providers. Thematic analysis showed that referring providers consider factors related to the specialist's clinical expertise (skill, training, outcomes, and assessments), interactions between the patient and specialist (prior experience, rapport, location, scheduling, preference, and insurance), and interactions between the referring physician and specialist (personal relationships, communication, reputation, reciprocity, and practice or system affiliation). Notably, studies did not describe how providers assess clinical or technical skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Referring providers rely on subjective factors and assessments to evaluate quality when selecting a specialist. There may be a role for guidelines and objective measures of quality to inform the choice of specialist by referring providers.

摘要

背景

医生转介是指导患者就诊高质量专家的关键步骤。尽管已经努力鼓励向高容量医院转介,但许多患者仍在低容量中心接受治疗,结果更差。我们旨在通过对医学和外科文献的系统回顾,确定转介医生在为患者选择专家时考虑的最重要因素。

方法

使用与转介、专业、手术、初级保健和决策相关的术语,从 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月在 PubMed 和 Embase 上进行了搜索。我们纳入了报告美国医疗保健提供者在向专家转介患者时考虑因素的调查和访谈研究。研究由两名独立审查员进行筛选。使用 CASP 清单评估质量。通过定性主题分析对研究中常见的决策因素进行综合。

结果

我们筛选了 1972 篇摘要,确定了 7 项符合纳入标准的研究,共报告了 1575 名提供者。主题分析表明,转介提供者考虑与专家临床专业知识相关的因素(技能、培训、结果和评估)、患者与专家之间的互动(既往经验、融洽度、位置、日程安排、偏好和保险)以及转介医生与专家之间的互动(人际关系、沟通、声誉、互惠和实践或系统隶属关系)。值得注意的是,这些研究并未描述提供者如何评估临床或技术技能。

结论

转介提供者在选择专家时依赖主观因素和评估来评估质量。可能需要指南和客观质量措施来为转介提供者选择专家提供信息。

相似文献

1
How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3444-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
4
Referring and Specialist Physician Gender and Specialist Billing.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328347. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28347.
5
Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 May;154(5):499-506. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.5.499.
6
A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Experiences with the Veterans Choice Program.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):598-603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
How many referrals to a pediatric orthopaedic hospital specialty clinic are primary care problems?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Oct-Nov;32(7):732-6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31826994a4.
10
Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States.
Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):39-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x.

引用本文的文献

3
Surgical Second Opinion for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Mar 1;240(3):270-278. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001213. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery at the Highest-Performing vs Chosen Local Hospitals.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55999.
5
Simulated data-driven hospital selection for surgical treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer in older adults.
Surgery. 2023 Jan;173(1):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.047. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2029238. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29238.
3
Should Interventional Cardiologists Super-Subspecialize?: Moving From Patient Selection to Operator Selection.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.029.
4
Understanding How Providers and Staff Make Decisions About Where to Refer Their Patients: A Qualitative Study.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2021 Jan/Mar;44(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000367.
6
Provider Viewpoints in the Management and Referral of Rectal Cancer.
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:370-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.073. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
7
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2108-2118. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
8
Internal medicine residents identify gaps in medical education on outpatient referrals.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 30;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02177-3.
9
Surgeon and hospital volume outcomes in bariatric surgery: a population-level study.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 May;16(5):674-681. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验