Suppr超能文献

脊柱胸部活动范围的主动测量系统分析:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Analysis of the Active Measurement Systems of the Thoracic Range of Movements of the Spine: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Esteban-González Pablo, Sánchez-Romero Eleuterio A, Villafañe Jorge Hugo

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Vil-laviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.

Musculoskeletal Pain and Motor Control Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 15;22(8):3042. doi: 10.3390/s22083042.

Abstract

(1) Objective: to analyze current active noninvasive measurement systems of the thoracic range of movements of the spine. (2) Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed that included observational or clinical trial studies published in English or Spanish, whose subjects were healthy human males or females ≥18 years of age with reported measurements of thoracic range of motion measured with an active system in either flexion, extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation. All studies that passed the screening had a low risk of bias and good methodological results, according to the PEDro and MINORS scales. The mean values and 95% confidence interval of the reported measures were calculated for different types of device groups. To calculate the differences between the type of device measures, studies were pooled for different types of device groups using Review Manager software. (3) Results: 48 studies were included in the review; all had scores higher than 7.5 over 10 on the PEDro and MINORs methodological rating scales, collecting a total of 2365 healthy subjects, 1053 males and 1312 females; they were 39.24 ± 20.64 years old and had 24.44 ± 3.81 kg/m body mass indexes on average. We summarized and analyzed a total of 11,892 measurements: 1298 of flexoextension, 1394 of flexion, 1021 of extension, 491 of side-to-side lateral flexion, 637 of right lateral flexion, 607 of left lateral flexion, 2170 of side-to-side rotation, 2152 of right rotation and 2122 of left rotation. (4) Conclusions: All collected and analyzed measurements of physiological movements of the dorsal spine had very disparate results from each other, the cause of the reason for such analysis is that the measurement protocols of the different types of measurement tools used in these measurements are different and cause measurement biases. To solve this, it is proposed to establish a standardized measurement protocol for all tools.

摘要

(1) 目的:分析当前用于测量脊柱胸部活动范围的主动式非侵入性测量系统。(2) 方法:进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入以英文或西班牙文发表的观察性或临床试验研究,其研究对象为年龄≥18岁的健康男性或女性,报告了使用主动式系统测量的胸部屈伸、侧弯或轴向旋转活动范围。根据PEDro和MINORS量表,所有通过筛选的研究均具有低偏倚风险和良好的方法学结果。计算不同类型设备组报告测量值的平均值和95%置信区间。为计算设备测量类型之间的差异,使用Review Manager软件对不同类型设备组的研究进行汇总。(3) 结果:该评价纳入了48项研究;所有研究在PEDro和MINORs方法学评分量表上的得分均高于7.5分(满分10分),共收集了2365名健康受试者,其中男性1053名,女性1312名;他们的平均年龄为39.24±20.64岁,平均体重指数为24.44±3.81 kg/m²。我们总共总结并分析了11892次测量:屈伸1298次、前屈1394次、后伸1021次、左右侧弯491次、右侧弯637次、左侧弯607次、左右旋转2170次、右旋2152次和左旋2122次。(4) 结论:所有收集并分析的胸椎生理活动测量结果彼此差异很大,造成这种分析结果差异的原因是这些测量中使用的不同类型测量工具的测量方案不同,从而导致测量偏差。为解决这一问题,建议为所有工具建立标准化测量方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c1/9026805/22536bcfd47f/sensors-22-03042-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验