Suppr超能文献

比较不同认知障碍程度个体的急诊科使用情况。

Comparing emergency department use among individuals with varying levels of cognitive impairment.

机构信息

BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 800 University Bay Drive Suite 310, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 2;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03093-5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As the population ages, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are becoming increasingly common in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). This study compares the frequency of ED use among a cohort of individuals with well-defined cognitive performance (cognitively intact, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and ADRD).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of English-speaking, community-dwelling individuals evaluated at four health system-based multidisciplinary memory clinics from 2014-2016. We obtained demographic and clinical data, including neuropsychological testing results, through chart review and linkage to electronic health record data. We characterized the frequency and quantity of ED use within one year (6 months before and after) of cognitive evaluation and compared ED use between the three groups using bivariate and multivariate approaches.

RESULTS

Of the 779 eligible patients, 89 were diagnosed as cognitively intact, 372 as MCI, and 318 as ADRD. The proportion of subjects with any annual ED use did not increase significantly with greater cognitive impairment: cognitively intact (16.9%), MCI (26.1%), and ADRD (28.9%) (p = 0.072). Average number of ED visits increased similarly: cognitively intact (0.27, SD 0.72), MCI (0.41, SD 0.91), and ADRD (0.55, SD 1.25) (p = 0.059). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that patients with MCI (odds ratio (OR) 1.62; CI = 0.87-3.00) and ADRD (OR 1.84; CI = 0.98-3.46) did not significantly differ from cognitively intact adults in any ED use. Multivariate negative binomial regression found patients with MCI (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.38; CI = 0.79-2.41) and ADRD (IRR 1.76, CI = 1.00-3.10) had elevated but non-significant risk of an ED visit compared to cognitively intact individuals.

CONCLUSION

Though there was no significant difference in ED use in this small sample from one health system, our estimates are comparable to other published work. Results suggested a trend towards higher utilization among adults with MCI or ADRD compared to those who were cognitively intact. We must confirm our findings in other settings to better understand how to optimize systems of acute illness care for individuals with MCI and ADRD.

摘要

简介

随着人口老龄化,阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)在急诊科就诊患者中越来越常见。本研究比较了认知表现明确的队列中个体的急诊使用频率(认知正常、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和 ADRD)。

方法

我们对 2014-2016 年来自四个基于健康系统的多学科记忆诊所的英语社区居住者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们通过图表审查和与电子健康记录数据的链接获得人口统计学和临床数据,包括神经心理学测试结果。我们描述了认知评估后一年(前 6 个月和后 6 个月)内急诊使用的频率和数量,并使用双变量和多变量方法比较了三组之间的急诊使用情况。

结果

在 779 名合格患者中,89 名被诊断为认知正常,372 名被诊断为 MCI,318 名被诊断为 ADRD。有任何年度急诊使用的受试者比例随着认知障碍的增加没有显著增加:认知正常(16.9%)、MCI(26.1%)和 ADRD(28.9%)(p=0.072)。急诊就诊次数的平均增加情况相似:认知正常(0.27,SD 0.72)、MCI(0.41,SD 0.91)和 ADRD(0.55,SD 1.25)(p=0.059)。多变量逻辑回归结果表明,MCI 患者(比值比(OR)1.62;CI=0.87-3.00)和 ADRD 患者(OR 1.84;CI=0.98-3.46)与认知正常成年人相比,急诊就诊没有显著差异。多变量负二项回归发现,MCI 患者(发病率比(IRR)1.38;CI=0.79-2.41)和 ADRD 患者(IRR 1.76,CI=1.00-3.10)的急诊就诊风险升高,但无统计学意义。

结论

尽管在这个来自单一健康系统的小样本中,急诊使用没有显著差异,但我们的估计与其他已发表的研究相当。结果表明,与认知正常的成年人相比,MCI 或 ADRD 成年人的利用率呈上升趋势。我们必须在其他环境中确认我们的发现,以更好地了解如何为 MCI 和 ADRD 个体优化急性疾病护理系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5105/9059422/ce60a4fc0768/12877_2022_3093_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验