Habib M, Galaburda A M
Rev Neurol (Paris). 1986;142(12):869-94.
This review summarizes the present evidence for a biological basis of functional brain asymmetry. Morphological asymmetries, despite long-standing knowledge, have only recently aroused general interest. The most striking asymmetries involve regions of the cerebral cortex located around the posterior end of the Sylvian fissures: mainly studied was the planum temporale, but others include the parietal operculum, inferior parietal lobule, and inferior frontal gyrus. In most instances, cortical areas proved to bear asymmetries favouring the left hemisphere. Architectonic studies also revealed asymmetrical features; especially area "Tpt", roughly similar to Wernicke's posterior language area, has been found up to 7 times larger on the left than on the right hemisphere. Similar asymmetries were discovered in fetal brains, as early as the 30th gestational week, as well as in the cerebral cortex of some apes. These data suggest that morphological asymmetries need not be the consequence of functional effects but rather a predetermined feature, probably widely spread throughout animal kingdom. An open question remains as to the functional significance of these asymmetries. In this regard, studies have dealt with possible correlations between morphological asymmetries (as assessed in vivo by cerebral neuro-imaging methods) and features of functional asymmetry, especially handedness and hemispheric dominance for language. Despite incomplete results, available data suggest a significant correlation, at least in dextrals. The exact nature of these relationships remains speculative. Knowledge about the contribution of genetic factors in determining cerebral dominance followed observations of familial clustering of functional asymmetries, especially sinistrality, as well as studies in mono- and dizygotic twins. However, a purely genetic model seems to be unable to account consistently for the data. Hypotheses emphasizing birth stress may be only exceptionally verified. Actually, current evidence points to a specific period in the fetal life, probably around the 6th gestational month, during which neurons in post-migrational stage set up their synaptic contacts. The final gyral pattern of the brain probably builds up during this period, as a consequence of a mechanism of competition for synapses among different cortical areas which regulates the amount of neuronal growth and death. Such a mechanism probably also accounts for the development of cortical asymmetries.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
这篇综述总结了目前关于功能性脑不对称生物学基础的证据。形态学上的不对称,尽管早为人知,但直到最近才引起广泛关注。最显著的不对称涉及位于外侧裂后端周围的大脑皮质区域:主要研究的是颞平面,但其他区域包括顶叶岛盖、顶下小叶和额下回。在大多数情况下,皮质区域被证明存在有利于左半球的不对称。建筑结构研究也揭示了不对称特征;特别是大致类似于韦尼克后语言区的“Tpt”区域,在左半球的面积被发现比右半球大7倍。早在妊娠第30周时,在胎儿大脑以及一些猿类的大脑皮质中也发现了类似的不对称。这些数据表明,形态学上的不对称不一定是功能影响的结果,而更可能是一种预先确定的特征,可能在整个动物界广泛存在。关于这些不对称的功能意义仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在这方面,研究探讨了形态学不对称(通过大脑神经成像方法在体内评估)与功能不对称特征之间的可能相关性,特别是利手和语言的半球优势。尽管结果并不完整,但现有数据表明至少在右利手人群中存在显著相关性。这些关系的确切性质仍属推测。关于遗传因素在确定大脑优势方面的作用的认识,是在观察到功能性不对称的家族聚集现象,特别是左利手,以及对单卵双胞胎和双卵双胞胎的研究之后得出的。然而,一个纯粹的遗传模型似乎无法始终如一地解释这些数据。强调出生应激的假设可能只是偶尔得到验证。实际上,目前的证据指向胎儿期的一个特定时期,可能在妊娠第6个月左右,在此期间迁移后的神经元建立突触联系。大脑最终的脑回模式可能在此期间形成,这是不同皮质区域之间突触竞争机制的结果,该机制调节神经元的生长和死亡数量。这样一种机制可能也解释了皮质不对称的发展。(摘要截取自400字)