Department of Pathology, Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 165 chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon University Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Virchows Arch. 2022 Jul;481(1):23-29. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03336-1. Epub 2022 May 16.
The differentiation between reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH) and diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is challenging especially when applied on peritoneal small samples. The use of BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) and methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) immunostains is familiar to identify malignant mesothelial proliferation. Recently, nuclear 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) was reported to be a new recognition tool of pleural mesothelial malignancy on surgical specimens. However, application of 5-hmC immunostaining has not yet studied in peritoneal specimens from small biopsies or cytology cell-blocks. The aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this new marker combination to distinguish DMPM from RMH in biopsies and cell-blocks. Seventy-five cases were analyzed; among which, 38 were of cytological specimens including 6 RMH and 32 DMPM, and 37 tissue biopsies with 7 RMH and 30 DMPM. BAP1, MTAP, and 5-hmC immunostains were performed on all cases. RMH cases exhibited a retained staining with all immunostains. Among DMPM, BAP1 was lost in 71.8% of cytology cell-blocks and 66.7% of biopsies. MTAP was lost in 40.6% of cytology cell-blocks and 33.3% of biopsies. 5-hmC was lost in 40.6% of cytology cell-blocks and 30% of biopsies. The combination of BAP1, MTAP, and 5-hmC showed the best accuracy in differential diagnosis between RMH and DMPM (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 1 in cytology cell-blocks; sensitivity = 0.90, specificity = 1 in biopsy). The best diagnostic combination in peritoneal cytology effusion fluids and biopsies samples provided by BAP1, MTAP, and 5-hmC should be applied on a diagnostic step-wise algorithm by pathologists involved into the management of DMPM, because of their therapeutic implications.
反应性间皮增生(RMH)与弥漫性恶性腹膜间皮瘤(DMPM)的鉴别具有挑战性,尤其是在应用于腹膜小样本时。BRCA 相关蛋白 1(BAP1)和甲基硫腺苷磷酸化酶(MTAP)免疫染色已被用于识别恶性间皮增殖。最近,核 5-羟甲基胞嘧啶(5-hmC)被报道为一种新的胸膜间皮恶性肿瘤识别工具,用于外科标本。然而,5-hmC 免疫染色在来自小活检或细胞学细胞块的腹膜标本中的应用尚未研究。本研究旨在评估该新标志物组合在活检和细胞块中区分 DMPM 和 RMH 的诊断准确性。分析了 75 例病例;其中,38 例为细胞学标本,包括 6 例 RMH 和 32 例 DMPM,37 例组织活检,包括 7 例 RMH 和 30 例 DMPM。所有病例均进行了 BAP1、MTAP 和 5-hmC 免疫染色。RMH 病例的所有免疫染色均保持阳性。在 DMPM 中,BAP1 在 71.8%的细胞学细胞块和 66.7%的活检中丢失。MTAP 在 40.6%的细胞学细胞块和 33.3%的活检中丢失。5-hmC 在 40.6%的细胞学细胞块和 30%的活检中丢失。BAP1、MTAP 和 5-hmC 的组合在 RMH 和 DMPM 的鉴别诊断中具有最佳的准确性(细胞块的敏感性=0.84,特异性=1;活检的敏感性=0.90,特异性=1)。在腹膜细胞学渗出液和活检样本中,BAP1、MTAP 和 5-hmC 的最佳诊断组合应由参与 DMPM 管理的病理学家应用于诊断逐步算法,因为这具有治疗意义。