Rojas Sebastian V, Junghans Simon, Fox Henrik, Lazouski Kanstantsin, Schramm Rene, Morshuis Michiel, Gummert Jan F, Gross Justus
Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG, 25551 Hohenlockstedt, Germany.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 29;11(5):602. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050602.
We report a case of severe outflow graft infection following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A 51-year old male LVAD patient was readmitted to our hospital presenting signs of systemic infection. One year previously, LVAD implantation (HeartMate3, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) with concomitant patent foramen ovale closure had been performed in the context of end-stage heart failure due to dilative cardiomyopathy (INTERMACS III). The indication for LVAD-therapy was bridge-to-candidacy, since the patient did not instantly fulfill all criteria for cardiac transplantation. At admission, a PET-CT scan unveiled fluid accumulation, encircling the outflow-graft prosthesis (SUV 10.5) with contrast-enhancement involving the intrathoracic driveline (SUV 11.2). Since cardiac transplantation was not feasible, the patient underwent surgical revision. In the first step, redo sternotomy was performed with local debridement, including jet lavage. Intraoperative swabs confirmed bacterial infection with . Following this, the patient underwent negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with instillation using the V.A.C. VERAFLO system (KCI-3M, San Antonio, TX, USA) for a total of 19 days. Due to the severity of infection, local bacteriophage application was performed within the wound closure. In order to concentrate phage therapy at the infection site, phages were applied using a novel semi-fluid galenic. After wound closure, the patient was discharged with an uneventful course. A control PET-CT scan 3 months after discharge showed a significant decrease in infection (outflow graft: SUV 7.2, intrathoracic driveline: SUV 3.0) correlated with contrast enhancement. Bacterial infection of intrathoracic VAD components represents a severe and potentially life-threatening complication. If cardiac transplantation is not feasible, complex wound management strategies are required. Local bacteriophage therapy might be a promising addition to already established therapeutical options. In order to improve bacteriophage retention at the wound site, application of a viscous galenic might be beneficial.
我们报告一例左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后严重的流出道移植物感染病例。一名51岁的男性LVAD患者因出现全身感染迹象再次入院。一年前,该患者因扩张型心肌病导致终末期心力衰竭(INTERMACS III级),接受了LVAD植入手术(HeartMate3,美国雅培公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)并同时闭合了卵圆孔未闭。LVAD治疗的指征是过渡到心脏移植候选状态,因为该患者并未立即满足心脏移植的所有标准。入院时,PET-CT扫描显示有液体聚集,环绕流出道移植物假体(标准化摄取值为10.5),且增强扫描显示胸内驱动线有强化(标准化摄取值为11.2)。由于心脏移植不可行,患者接受了手术翻修。第一步,再次进行胸骨切开术并进行局部清创,包括喷射冲洗。术中拭子证实细菌感染……。此后,患者使用V.A.C. VERAFLO系统(美国得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市KCI-3M公司)进行了共19天的负压伤口治疗(NPWT)并滴注药物。由于感染严重,在伤口闭合时进行了局部噬菌体应用。为了使噬菌体疗法集中在感染部位,使用了一种新型半流体药剂来应用噬菌体。伤口闭合后,患者顺利出院。出院3个月后的对照PET-CT扫描显示感染明显减轻(流出道移植物:标准化摄取值为7.2,胸内驱动线:标准化摄取值为3.0),且与增强扫描结果相关。胸内VAD组件的细菌感染是一种严重且可能危及生命的并发症。如果心脏移植不可行,则需要复杂的伤口处理策略。局部噬菌体疗法可能是现有治疗方案中一个有前景的补充。为了提高噬菌体在伤口部位的留存率,应用粘性药剂可能有益。