Marin Sergio, Martin Val Alba, Bosch Peligero Maite, Rodríguez-Bernuz Cristina, Pérez-Ricart Ariadna, Vilaró Jaques Laia, Paredes Roger, Roca Josep, Quiñones Carles
Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 May 21;15(5):634. doi: 10.3390/ph15050634.
Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have recently become the focus of global attention as possible treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The current systematic review aims to assess their safety in short treatments (≤14 days), whether used alone or in combination with other drugs. Following the PRISMA and SWiM recommendations, a search was conducted using four health databases for all relevant English-, Chinese-, and Spanish-language studies from inception through 30 July 2021. Patients treated for any condition and with any comparator were included. The outcomes of interest were early drug adverse effects and their frequency. A total of 254 articles met the inclusion criteria, including case and case-control reports as well as cross-sectional, cohort, and randomised studies. The results were summarised either qualitatively in table or narrative form or, when possible (99 studies), quantitatively in terms of adverse event frequencies. Quality evaluation was conducted using the CARE, STROBE, and JADAD tools. This systematic review showed that safety depended on drug indication. In COVID-19 patients, cardiac adverse effects, such as corrected QT interval prolongation, were relatively frequent (0-27.3% and up to 33% if combined with azithromycin), though the risk of torsade de pointes was low. Compared to non-COVID-19 patients, COVID-19 patients experienced a higher frequency of cardiac adverse effects regardless of the regimen used. Dermatological adverse effects affected 0-10% of patients with autoimmune diseases and COVID-19. A broad spectrum of neuropsychiatric adverse effects affected patients treated with CQ for malaria with variable frequencies and some cases were reported in COVID-19 patients. Gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred regardless of drug indication affecting 0-50% of patients. In conclusion, CQ and HCQ are two safe drugs widely used in the treatment of malaria and autoimmune diseases. However, recent findings on their cardiac and neuropsychiatric adverse effects should be considered if these drugs were to be proposed as antivirals again.
氯喹(CQ)和羟氯喹(HCQ)作为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)可能的治疗方法,最近成为全球关注的焦点。本系统评价旨在评估它们在短期治疗(≤14天)中的安全性,无论单独使用还是与其他药物联合使用。遵循PRISMA和SWiM建议,使用四个健康数据库进行检索,纳入自数据库建立至2021年7月30日所有相关的英文、中文和西班牙文研究。纳入接受任何治疗且使用任何对照的患者。感兴趣的结局为早期药物不良反应及其发生率。共有254篇文章符合纳入标准,包括病例报告、病例对照研究以及横断面研究、队列研究和随机对照研究。结果以表格或叙述形式进行定性总结,或在可能的情况下(99项研究),就不良事件发生率进行定量总结。使用CARE、STROBE和JADAD工具进行质量评估。本系统评价表明,安全性取决于药物适应证。在COVID-19患者中,心脏不良反应相对常见,如校正QT间期延长(单独使用时为0-27.3%,与阿奇霉素联用时高达33%),尽管尖端扭转型室速风险较低。与非COVID-19患者相比,无论使用何种治疗方案,COVID-19患者发生心脏不良反应的频率更高。皮肤不良反应影响0-10%的自身免疫性疾病和COVID-19患者。广泛的神经精神不良反应以不同频率影响接受CQ治疗疟疾的患者,COVID-19患者中也报告了一些病例。无论药物适应证如何,胃肠道不良反应均会发生,影响0-50%的患者。总之,CQ和HCQ是广泛用于治疗疟疾和自身免疫性疾病的两种安全药物。然而,如果再次将这些药物作为抗病毒药物提出,应考虑其近期关于心脏和神经精神不良反应的研究结果。