Suppr超能文献

2020 年 11 月 9 日至 2021 年 2 月 10 日期间葡萄牙实施严格的非药物干预对第二波和第三波 COVID-19 疫情的影响:一项生态学研究。

Impact of stringent non-pharmaceutical interventions applied during the second and third COVID-19 epidemic waves in Portugal, 9 November 2020 to 10 February 2021: an ecological study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.

Public Health Research Center, NOVA National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(23). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.23.2100497.

Abstract

BackgroundNon-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were implemented worldwide to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2.AimTo evaluate the impact of tiered NPIs and a nationwide lockdown on reduction of COVID-19 incidence during the second and third epidemic waves in Portugal.MethodsSurveillance data on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were used to conduct an interrupted time series analysis to estimate changes in daily incidence during a second wave tiered NPI period (9 November-18 December 2020), and a third wave lockdown period without (15-21 January 2021) and with school closure (22 January-10 February 2021).ResultsSignificant changes in trends were observed for the overall incidence rate; declining trends were observed for tiered NPIs (-1.9% per day; incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.981; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.973-0.989) and a lockdown period without (-3.4% per day; IRR: 0.966; 95% CI: 0.935-0.998) and with school closure (-10.3% per day, IRR: 0.897; 95% CI: 0.846-0.951). Absolute effects associated with tiered NPIs and a lockdown on a subsequent 14-day period yielded 137 cases and 437 cases per 100,000 population potentially averted, respectively.ConclusionOur results indicate that tiered NPIs implemented during the second wave caused a decline in COVID-19 incidence, although modest. Moreover, a third wave lockdown without school closure was effective in reducing COVID-19 incidence, but the addition of school closure provided the strongest effect. These findings emphasise the importance of early and assertive decision-making to control the pandemic.

摘要

背景

非药物干预(NPIs)在全球范围内被实施以控制 SARS-CoV-2 的传播。

目的

评估分层 NPI 和全国封锁对葡萄牙第二波和第三波 COVID-19 疫情中发病率降低的影响。

方法

使用实验室确诊的 COVID-19 病例监测数据进行中断时间序列分析,以估计第二波分层 NPI 期间(2020 年 11 月 9 日至 12 月 18 日)和第三波无封锁(2021 年 1 月 15 日至 21 日)和有学校关闭(2021 年 1 月 22 日至 2 月 10 日)期间的每日发病率变化。

结果

观察到整体发病率趋势发生显著变化;分层 NPI 呈下降趋势(-1.9%/天;发病率比(IRR):0.981;95%置信区间(CI):0.973-0.989)和无封锁期(-3.4%/天;IRR:0.966;95%CI:0.935-0.998)和有学校关闭(-10.3%/天,IRR:0.897;95%CI:0.846-0.951)。分层 NPI 和封锁在随后的 14 天内产生的绝对效果分别为每 10 万人可预防 137 例和 437 例病例。

结论

我们的结果表明,第二波实施的分层 NPI 导致 COVID-19 发病率下降,尽管幅度不大。此外,无学校关闭的第三波封锁在降低 COVID-19 发病率方面是有效的,但增加学校关闭则产生了最强的效果。这些发现强调了早期果断决策控制大流行的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8232/9198658/8afd7c107884/2100497-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验