Suppr超能文献

一种新的致癌性分类方法。

A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.

National Heart and Lung Institute, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2022 Sep;96(9):2419-2428. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03324-z. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

Abstract

Concern over substances that may cause cancer has led to various classification schemes to recognize carcinogenic threats and provide a basis to manage those threats. The least useful schemes have a binary choice that declares a substance carcinogenic or not. This overly simplistic approach ignores the complexity of cancer causation by considering neither how the substance causes cancer, nor the potency of that mode of action. Consequently, substances are classified simply as "carcinogenic", compromising the opportunity to properly manage these kinds of substances. It will likely be very difficult, if not impossible, to incorporate New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) into binary schemes. In this paper we propose a new approach cancer classification scheme that segregates substances by both mode of action and potency into three categories and, as a consequence, provides useful guidance in the regulation and management of substances with carcinogenic potential. Examples are given, including aflatoxin (category A), trichlorethylene (category B), and titanium dioxide (category C), which demonstrate the clear differentiation among these substances that generate appropriate levels of concern and management options.

摘要

对可能致癌的物质的担忧导致了各种分类方案的出现,以识别致癌威胁并为管理这些威胁提供依据。最无用的方案是做出二元选择,即宣布一种物质是否致癌。这种过于简单化的方法忽略了癌症成因的复杂性,既不考虑物质致癌的方式,也不考虑这种作用方式的效力。因此,物质只是被简单地归类为“致癌物质”,从而失去了妥善管理这些物质的机会。如果不是不可能的话,将新方法(NAMs)纳入二元方案也将非常困难。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的癌症分类方案,该方案根据作用方式和效力将物质分为三类,因此为具有致癌潜力的物质的监管和管理提供了有用的指导。给出了一些例子,包括黄曲霉毒素(A 类)、三氯乙烯(B 类)和二氧化钛(C 类),这些例子清楚地区分了这些物质,产生了适当程度的关注和管理选择。

相似文献

1
A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity.
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Sep;96(9):2419-2428. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03324-z. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
Hazard identification, classification, and risk assessment of carcinogens: too much or too little? - Report of an ECETOC workshop.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020 Jan;50(1):72-95. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1727843. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Dec;26(3):288-95. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1152.
4
Threshold and non-threshold chemical carcinogens: A survey of the present regulatory landscape.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:291-302. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
6
A classification framework and practical guidance for establishing a mode of action for chemical carcinogens.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;45(1):9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Mar 10.
8
Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.
Drug Metab Rev. 1996 Feb-May;28(1-2):149-79. doi: 10.3109/03602539608993997.
9
Weight of evidence analysis of the tumorigenic potential of 1,3-dichloropropene supports a threshold-based risk assessment.
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020 Nov;50(10):836-860. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1845119. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.
Arch Toxicol. 2020 Jun;94(6):1787-1877. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02733-2. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
ToxPoint: Chemical risks and children's health-building on progress based on science, not panic.
Toxicol Sci. 2025 Jul 1;206(1):1-3. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaf051.
2
New approach methodologies to facilitate and improve the hazard assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens-a PARC project.
Front Toxicol. 2023 Jul 10;5:1220998. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1220998. eCollection 2023.
3
Genotoxicity assessment: opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose-response data.
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Sep;97(9):2303-2328. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03553-w. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Towards a future regulatory framework for chemicals in the European Union - Chemicals 2.0.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;142:105431. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.
Comput Toxicol. 2021 Nov;20. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100191. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
2
Principles of dose-setting in toxicology studies: the importance of kinetics for ensuring human safety.
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Dec;95(12):3651-3664. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03155-4. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
The codification of hazard and its impact on the hazard versus risk controversy.
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Nov;95(11):3611-3621. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03145-6. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
The modification of cancer risk by chemicals.
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2021 Jul 12;10(4):800-809. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfab064. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Integration of data across toxicity endpoints for improved safety assessment of chemicals: the example of carcinogenicity assessment.
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jun;95(6):1971-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03035-x. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
7
A comprehensive view on mechanistic approaches for cancer risk assessment of non-genotoxic agrochemicals.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;118:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104789. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Evaluation of the Inherent Toxicity Concept in Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Dec;39(12):2351-2360. doi: 10.1002/etc.4881. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Carcinogenicity assessment: Addressing the challenges of cancer and chemicals in the environment.
Environ Int. 2019 Jul;128:417-429. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.067. Epub 2019 May 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验