Suppr超能文献

奥氮平 5 毫克与 10 毫克预防未使用神经激肽-1 受体拮抗剂的高致吐风险化疗药物所致恶心呕吐的疗效比较。

Efficacy of Olanzapine 5 mg versus 10 mg for the Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy without Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist.

机构信息

Division of Chemotherapy, Chonburi Cancer Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand.

Division of Pharmacy, Chonburi Cancer Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):2137-2143. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.2137.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of two different dosage levels of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving high emetic risk chemotherapy.

METHODS

This study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial designed to show non-inferiority in the efficacy of olanzapine 5 mg compared to 10 mg in patients treated with high dose cisplatin or doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower margin of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) that not lower than the margin set at -25%.

RESULT

A total of 140 patients were randomized to 5 mg group (n=70) or 10 mg group (n=70) of olanzapine. The complete response (CR) rate in the overall phase of olanzapine 5 and 10 mg was 58.6% v 62.9% (95%CI: -20.4, 11.8). The CR rate comparison between olanzapine 5 and 10 mg was 81.4% v 74.3% (95%CI: -6-6, 20.8) and 66.7% v 76.1% (95%CI: -23.5, 6.3) for the acute and delayed phase, respectively. No nausea rates in acute, delayed and overall phase were 70.0% v 68.6% (95%CI: -13.8, 16.6), 45.7% v 48.6% (95%CI: -19.4, 13.6) and 43.5% v 47.9% (95%CI: -19.2, 13.6). The rate of adverse events (AE) including somnolence were not different between the 5 and 10 mg groups.

CONCLUSION

The two dosage levels of olanzapine were not different in terms of the efficacy and AE in the prophylaxis of CINV.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同剂量水平的奥氮平预防接受高致吐风险化疗的患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究为一项随机、双盲、对照试验,旨在显示高剂量顺铂或多柔比星/环磷酰胺治疗患者中奥氮平 5 毫克与 10 毫克的疗效无差异。非劣效性定义为 95%置信区间(95%CI)下限不低于设定下限 -25%。

结果

共 140 例患者随机分为奥氮平 5mg 组(n=70)或 10mg 组(n=70)。奥氮平 5mg 和 10mg 总缓解率(CR)分别为 58.6%和 62.9%(95%CI:-20.4,11.8)。奥氮平 5mg 和 10mg 的 CR 率比较分别为 81.4%和 74.3%(95%CI:-6-6,20.8)和 66.7%和 76.1%(95%CI:-23.5,6.3),用于急性和延迟期。急性、延迟和总缓解期无恶心发生率分别为 70.0%和 68.6%(95%CI:-13.8,16.6)、45.7%和 48.6%(95%CI:-19.4,13.6)和 43.5%和 47.9%(95%CI:-19.2,13.6)。奥氮平 5mg 和 10mg 组不良反应(AE)发生率包括嗜睡无差异。

结论

两种剂量水平的奥氮平在预防 CINV 的疗效和 AE 方面无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f3c/9587814/591c02a8b6b5/APJCP-23-2137-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验