Suppr超能文献

围产期护理中用于指导临床实践的患者报告结局和体验测量:前瞻性观察研究。

Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilhemina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 5;24(7):e37725. doi: 10.2196/37725.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement has published a set of patient-centered outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth (PCB set), including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). To establish value-based pregnancy and childbirth care, the PCB set was implemented in the Netherlands, using the outcomes on the patient level for shared decision-making and on an aggregated level for quality improvement.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to report first outcomes, experiences, and practice insights of implementing the PCB set in clinical practice.

METHODS

In total, 7 obstetric care networks across the Netherlands, each consisting of 1 or 2 hospitals and multiple community midwifery practices (ranging in number from 2 to 18), implemented the PROM and PREM domains of the PCB set as part of clinical routine. This observational study included all women participating in the clinical project. PROMs and PREMs were assessed with questionnaires at 5 time points: 2 during pregnancy and 3 post partum. Clinical threshold values (alerts) supported care professionals interpreting the answers, indicating possibly alarming outcomes per domain. Data collection took place from February 2020 to September 2021. Data analysis included missing (pattern) analysis, sum scores, alert rates, and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 1923 questionnaires were collected across the 5 time points: 816 (42.43%) at T1 (first trimester), 793 (41.23%) at T2 (early third trimester), 125 (6.5%) at T3 (maternity week), 170 (8.84%) at T4 (6 weeks post partum), and 19 (1%) at T5 (6 months post partum). Of these, 84% (1615/1923) were filled out completely. Missing items per domain ranged from 0% to 13%, with the highest missing rates for depression, pain with intercourse, and experience with pain relief at birth. No notable missing patterns were found. For the PROM domains, relatively high alert rates were found both in pregnancy and post partum for incontinence (469/1798, 26.08%), pain with intercourse (229/1005, 22.79%), breastfeeding self-efficacy (175/765, 22.88%), and mother-child bonding (122/288, 42.36%). Regarding the PREM domains, the highest alert rates were found for birth experience (37/170, 21.76%), shared decision-making (101/982, 10.29%), and discussing pain relief ante partum (310/793, 39.09%). Some domains showed very little clinical variation; for example, role of the mother and satisfaction with care.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCB set is a useful tool to assess patient-reported outcomes and experiences that need to be addressed over the whole course of pregnancy and childbirth. Our results provide opportunities to improve and personalize perinatal care. Furthermore, we could propose several recommendations regarding methods and timeline of measurements based on our findings. This study supports the implementation of the PCB set in clinical practice, thereby advancing the transformation toward patient-centered, value-based health care for pregnancy and childbirth.

摘要

背景

国际健康结果测量联合会发布了一套以患者为中心的妊娠和分娩结局测量指标(PCB 集),包括患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)和患者报告的体验测量(PREMs)。为了建立基于价值的妊娠和分娩护理,PCB 集已在荷兰实施,用于患者层面的共享决策和汇总层面的质量改进。

目的

本研究旨在报告在临床实践中实施 PCB 集的首批结果、经验和实践见解。

方法

荷兰共有 7 个产科护理网络,每个网络由 1 或 2 家医院和多个社区助产士实践组成(数量从 2 到 18 不等),作为临床常规的一部分,实施了 PCB 集的 PROM 和 PREM 领域。这项观察性研究包括所有参与临床项目的女性。在 5 个时间点使用问卷评估 PROMs 和 PREMs:怀孕的 2 次和产后的 3 次。临床阈值(警报)支持护理专业人员解释答案,每个领域都可能显示出令人担忧的结果。数据收集时间为 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 9 月。数据分析包括缺失(模式)分析、总分、警报率和敏感性分析。

结果

共收集了 5 个时间点的 1923 份问卷:T1(早孕)的 816 份(42.43%)、T2(早孕晚期)的 793 份(41.23%)、T3(分娩周)的 125 份(6.5%)、T4(产后 6 周)的 170 份(8.84%)和 T5(产后 6 个月)的 19 份(1%)。其中,84%(1615/1923)完整填写。每个领域的缺失项目比例从 0%到 13%不等,抑郁、性交疼痛和分娩时疼痛缓解的缺失率最高。未发现明显的缺失模式。对于 PROM 领域,在妊娠和产后期间,尿失禁(469/1798,26.08%)、性交疼痛(229/1005,22.79%)、母乳喂养自我效能(175/765,22.88%)和母婴关系(122/288,42.36%)的警报率相对较高。对于 PREM 领域,出生经历(37/170,21.76%)、共同决策(101/982,10.29%)和产前讨论疼痛缓解(310/793,39.09%)的警报率最高。一些领域的临床差异很小;例如,母亲的角色和对护理的满意度。

结论

PCB 集是评估需要在整个妊娠和分娩过程中解决的患者报告结局和体验的有用工具。我们的结果为改善和个性化围产期护理提供了机会。此外,我们可以根据研究结果提出一些关于测量方法和时间线的建议。本研究支持在临床实践中实施 PCB 集,从而推进以患者为中心、基于价值的妊娠和分娩护理的转型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4646/9297146/43f37f37f2fb/jmir_v24i7e37725_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验