Suppr超能文献

预测与观察葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者的无转移生存。

Predicted vs Observed Metastasis-Free Survival in Individuals With Uveal Melanoma.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 1;140(9):847-854. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.2623.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Accuracy of the predicted metastasis-free survival (MFS) by a commercially available gene expression profiling (GEP) test is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the predicted MFS with the observed MFS in patients in this cohort and with those in published studies (published MFS, meta-analysis).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included consecutive patients from the University of Iowa and Cleveland Clinic who were diagnosed with uveal melanoma who underwent prognostic fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the time of primary treatment. Patients were recruited from December 2012 to December 2020. The predicted MFS for patients was extracted from the GEP report. The observed MFS was defined as time to metastasis. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to identify tumor variables impacting MFS in patients with class 2 tumors. The overall estimate of the published MFS was obtained by performing meta-analysis of data from published series. Analysis took place in August 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

MFS.

RESULTS

There were 92 patients from the University of Iowa and 255 patients from the Cleveland Clinic. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 59.4 (13.0) years. The median (IQR) follow-up interval was 38.0 (19.0-57.0) months. The observed MFS for patients with class 2 tumor in this cohort (3 years: 67% [95% CI, 59%-77%]; 5 years: 47% [95% CI, 37%-61%]) and in published studies (3 years: 62% [95% CI, 57%-66%]; 5 years: 40% [95% CI, 34%-46%]) were better than those predicted (50% and 28% for 3 and 5 years, respectively). Within patients with class 2 tumor, those with metastasis had larger tumors compared with nonmetastatic tumors (mean largest basal diameter difference, 1.7 [95% CI, 0.5-3.0] mm; P = .01; mean thickness ratio, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.04-1.5]; P = .01, respectively). An increasing tumor size was significantly associated with increased hazard ratio (1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.27]; P < .001) of metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest the predicted MFS for metastatic tumors (class 2) appears to be worse than that observed here and reported by others. Incorporation of tumor size in the prediction model may enhance its accuracy. Adjuvant therapy trials may not be able to rely on predicted MFS to calculate efficacy with a high degree of confidence.

摘要

重要性

商业可用基因表达谱(GEP)测试预测无转移生存(MFS)的准确性尚不清楚。

目的

在本队列患者中比较预测的 MFS 与观察到的 MFS,并与已发表的研究(已发表的 MFS,荟萃分析)进行比较。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了在爱荷华大学和克利夫兰诊所接受治疗的连续诊断为葡萄膜黑色素瘤的患者,他们在原发性治疗时接受了预后细针抽吸活检。患者于 2012 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月间招募。从 GEP 报告中提取了患者的预测 MFS。观察到的 MFS 定义为转移时间。使用 Cox 比例风险模型确定 2 类肿瘤患者影响 MFS 的肿瘤变量。通过对已发表系列数据进行荟萃分析获得了总体估计的已发表 MFS。分析于 2021 年 8 月进行。

主要结局和测量

MFS。

结果

队列中有 92 名来自爱荷华大学的患者和 255 名来自克利夫兰诊所的患者。诊断时的平均(SD)年龄为 59.4(13.0)岁。中位(IQR)随访间隔为 38.0(19.0-57.0)个月。本队列中 2 类肿瘤患者的观察到的 MFS(3 年:67%[95%CI,59%-77%];5 年:47%[95%CI,37%-61%])和发表的研究(3 年:62%[95%CI,57%-66%];5 年:40%[95%CI,34%-46%])均优于预测值(分别为 50%和 28%,3 年和 5 年)。在 2 类肿瘤患者中,转移性肿瘤的肿瘤直径明显大于非转移性肿瘤(最大基底直径差异的平均值,1.7[95%CI,0.5-3.0]mm;P = .01;平均厚度比,1.3[95%CI,1.04-1.5];P = .01)。肿瘤大小的增加与转移的风险比(HR)显著相关(1.16[95%CI,1.06-1.27];P < .001)。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,转移性肿瘤(2 类)的预测 MFS 似乎比这里观察到的和其他人报告的更差。在预测模型中纳入肿瘤大小可能会提高其准确性。辅助治疗试验可能无法依靠预测的 MFS 来计算疗效,因为置信度很高。

相似文献

1
Predicted vs Observed Metastasis-Free Survival in Individuals With Uveal Melanoma.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 1;140(9):847-854. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.2623.
2
Gene Expression Profiling Prognostication of Posterior Uveal Melanoma: Does Size Matter?
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Jun;4(6):620-629. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Validation of the Prognostic Usefulness of the Gene Expression Profiling Test in Patients with Uveal Melanoma.
Ophthalmology. 2023 Jun;130(6):598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.01.020. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
4
Prognostic Implications of Tumor Diameter in Association With Gene Expression Profile for Uveal Melanoma.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 1;134(7):734-40. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0913.
5
Independent Prognostic Significance of Gene Expression Profile Class and Largest Basal Diameter of Posterior Uveal Melanomas.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;162:20-27.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Gene Expression Profiling and PRAME Status Versus Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging for Prognostication in Uveal Melanoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;195:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.045. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
8
Relationship between clinical features, GEP class, and PRAME expression in uveal melanoma.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;257(7):1541-1545. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04335-w. Epub 2019 May 7.
9
Variability of Bad Prognosis in Uveal Melanoma.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Feb;3(2):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Clinical Features, Metastasis, and Survival in Patients Younger Than 21 Years With Posterior Uveal Melanoma.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 1;137(1):75-81. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5132.

引用本文的文献

3
Clinical Implications of Ultrasound-Based Morphology in Choroidal Melanoma.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2025 Mar;9(3):263-271. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.09.010. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
4
Surveillance for Metastasis in High-Risk Uveal Melanoma Patients: Standard versus Enhanced Protocols.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;15(20):5025. doi: 10.3390/cancers15205025.
5
Validation of the Prognostic Usefulness of the Gene Expression Profiling Test in Patients with Uveal Melanoma.
Ophthalmology. 2023 Jun;130(6):598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.01.020. Epub 2023 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验