Wiegele Marion, Laxar Daniel, Schaden Eva, Baierl Andreas, Maleczek Mathias, Knöbl Paul, Hermann Martina, Hermann Alexander, Zauner Christian, Gratz Johannes
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 11;9:879425. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.879425. eCollection 2022.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, with an inherent requirement for anticoagulation to avoid circuit thrombosis, is a key element in the treatment of respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. Anticoagulation remains challenging, the standard of care being intravenous continuous administration of unfractionated heparin. Yet regimens vary. Some intensive care units in our center have successfully used enoxaparin subcutaneously in recent years and throughout the pandemic.
We retrospectively analyzed adult COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure who had been systemically anticoagulated using either enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. The choice of anticoagulant therapy was based on the standard of the intensive care unit. Defined thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events were analyzed as study endpoints.
Of 98 patients, 62 had received enoxaparin and 36 unfractionated heparin. All hazard ratios for the thromboembolic (3.43; 95% CI: 1.08-10.87; = 0.04), hemorrhagic (2.58; 95% CI: 1.03-6.48; = 0.04), and composite (2.86; 95% CI: 1.41-5.92; = 0.007) endpoints favored enoxaparin, whose efficient administration was verified by peak levels of anti-factor Xa (median: 0.45 IU ml; IQR: 0.38; 0.56). Activated partial thromboplastin time as well as thrombin time differed significantly (both p<0.001) between groups mirroring the effect of unfractionated heparin.
This study demonstrates the successful use of subcutaneous enoxaparin for systemic anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19 during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our findings are to be confirmed by future prospective, randomized, controlled trials.
体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)对抗凝有内在要求以避免体外循环血栓形成,是治疗与新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)相关的呼吸衰竭的关键要素。抗凝仍然具有挑战性,目前的标准治疗方法是静脉持续输注普通肝素。然而,治疗方案各不相同。近年来,在整个疫情期间,我们中心的一些重症监护病房成功地皮下使用了依诺肝素。
我们回顾性分析了使用依诺肝素或普通肝素进行全身抗凝的成年COVID-19呼吸衰竭患者。抗凝治疗的选择基于重症监护病房的标准。将明确的血栓栓塞和出血事件作为研究终点进行分析。
98例患者中,62例接受了依诺肝素治疗,36例接受了普通肝素治疗。血栓栓塞(风险比[HR]:3.43;95%置信区间[CI]:1.08 - 10.87;P = 0.04)、出血(HR:2.58;95%CI:1.03 - 6.48;P = 0.04)和复合终点(HR:2.86;95%CI:1.41 - 5.92;P = 0.007)的所有HR均支持依诺肝素,抗Xa因子峰值水平(中位数:0.45 IU/ml;四分位间距:0.38;0.56)证实了依诺肝素的有效给药。两组之间活化部分凝血活酶时间和凝血酶时间有显著差异(均P<0.001),这反映了普通肝素的作用。
本研究证明了皮下注射依诺肝素在COVID-19患者体外膜肺氧合期间成功用于全身抗凝。我们的研究结果有待未来前瞻性、随机、对照试验进一步证实。