Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA.
Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA.
Nutrients. 2022 Jul 29;14(15):3142. doi: 10.3390/nu14153142.
The purpose of this study was to understand the demographic, student, financial, and academic differences between marginally food secure college students and students with high, low, or very low food security (FS). Unlike highly food secure students, marginally food secure students worry about the quantity and quality of their food, yet they are classified in the same category as highly food secure individuals as per the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reporting standards. To investigate marginal FS among college students, a cross-sectional online survey was administered at a large, public, research university in the Northeastern United States. A largely representative sample of 6823 undergraduate students completed the survey with a 19.7% response rate. Self-reported level of FS was measured using the validated USDA 10-item FS survey module. Independent variables, such as demographic and student characteristics and cumulative grade point average (GPA), were gathered from institutional databases, and self-reported mechanisms of financing education were measured using a novel scale. Results from the multinomial logistic regression revealed statistically significant differences in GPA between students with marginal and high FS (p < 0.001), but not between students with marginal and low FS (p = 0.31). This work has implications beyond college students and suggests that marginally food secure populations should not be labeled as food secure.
本研究旨在了解边缘性食物保障大学生与高、低或极低食物保障(FS)大学生在人口统计学、学生、财务和学术方面的差异。与高度食物保障的学生不同,边缘性食物保障的学生担心食物的数量和质量,但根据美国农业部(USDA)的报告标准,他们被归为与高度食物保障的个体相同的类别。为了调查大学生的边缘性 FS,在美国东北部的一所大型公立研究型大学进行了一项横断面在线调查。共有 6823 名本科生完成了调查,响应率为 19.7%,这是一个具有代表性的样本。使用经过验证的 USDA 10 项 FS 调查模块来衡量自我报告的 FS 水平。从机构数据库中收集了独立变量,如人口统计学和学生特征以及累计平均绩点(GPA),并使用新的量表衡量自我报告的教育融资机制。多变量逻辑回归的结果显示,边缘性 FS 和高度 FS 学生之间的 GPA 存在统计学差异(p<0.001),但边缘性 FS 和低 FS 学生之间的 GPA 没有统计学差异(p=0.31)。这项工作的意义超出了大学生群体,表明不应将边缘性食物保障人群标记为食物保障。