Baker Timothy, Johnson Helen, Kotapati Srividya, Moshyk Andriy, Hamilton Melissa, Kurt Murat, Paly Victoria Federico
Global Health Economics, Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, ICON plc, ICON Clinical Research, 4131 Parklake Ave., Suite 600, Raleigh, NC, 27612, USA.
Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Sep;6(5):697-710. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) versus other first-line therapies for advanced melanoma in the United States (US) from the third-party payer perspective.
This analysis estimated total expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs for first-line treatments of advanced melanoma during a 30-year time horizon using indirect treatment comparisons based on time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and a three-state partitioned survival model. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival reference curves were extrapolated based on 5-year follow-up from the phase III Checkmate 067 trial (NCT01844505). Comparators of NIVO + IPI were NIVO, IPI, pembrolizumab, dabrafenib plus trametinib, encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Drug acquisition costs, treatment administration costs, follow-up time, subsequent therapy data, and adverse event frequencies were obtained from published sources. Utility weights were estimated from Checkmate 067, which compared NIVO + IPI or NIVO monotherapy with IPI monotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced melanoma. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity scenarios for BRAF-mutant subgroups were conducted.
NIVO + IPI was estimated to generate the longest OS and the highest total costs versus all comparators, accruing 6.99 LYs, 5.70 QALYs, and $469,469 over the 30-year time horizon. The incremental cost utility of NIVO + IPI versus comparators ranged from $2130 per QALY (versus ENCO + BINI) to $76,169 per QALY (versus NIVO). In all base-case and most sensitivity analyses, the incremental cost-utility ratios for NIVO + IPI were below $100,000 per QALY.
NIVO + IPI is estimated to be a life-extending and cost-effective treatment versus other therapies in the US, with base-case incremental cost-utility ratios below $100,000 per QALY.
本研究旨在从第三方支付方的角度评估纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗(NIVO + IPI)与美国其他晚期黑色素瘤一线治疗方案相比的成本效益。
本分析使用基于随时间变化的风险比(HR)的间接治疗比较和三状态分区生存模型,估计了30年时间范围内晚期黑色素瘤一线治疗的总预期生命年数(LYs)、质量调整生命年数(QALYs)和成本。基于III期Checkmate 067试验(NCT01844505)的5年随访数据外推总生存(OS)和无进展生存参考曲线。NIVO + IPI的对照方案包括NIVO、IPI、帕博利珠单抗、达拉非尼联合曲美替尼、恩考芬尼联合比美替尼(ENCO + BINI)以及维莫非尼联合考比替尼。药物购置成本、治疗管理成本、随访时间、后续治疗数据以及不良事件发生率均来自已发表的资料。效用权重根据Checkmate 067试验估算,该试验比较了NIVO + IPI或NIVO单药治疗与IPI单药治疗作为晚期黑色素瘤一线治疗方案的疗效。成本和结果采用3%的年贴现率。对BRAF突变亚组进行了敏感性分析。
与所有对照方案相比,估计NIVO + IPI可产生最长的总生存期和最高的总成本,在30年时间范围内累积6.99个生命年、5.70个质量调整生命年,成本为469,469美元。NIVO + IPI相对于对照方案的增量成本效益范围为每质量调整生命年2130美元(相对于ENCO + BINI)至每质量调整生命年76,169美元(相对于NIVO)。在所有基础病例和大多数敏感性分析中,NIVO + IPI的增量成本效益比均低于每质量调整生命年100,000美元。
在美国,与其他治疗方案相比,估计NIVO + IPI是一种可延长生命且具有成本效益的治疗方案,基础病例增量成本效益比低于每质量调整生命年100,000美元。