Suppr超能文献

美国早期生育率下降:使用新的综合公共使用微观数据系列(IPUMS)全计数人口普查微观数据和增强的县级数据对替代假设的检验

Early Fertility Decline in the United States: Tests of Alternative Hypotheses using New IPUMS Complete-Count Census Microdata and Enhanced County-Level Data.

作者信息

Hacker J David, Haines Michael R, Jaremski Matthew

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Department of History, 1110 Heller Hall, 271 19th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Department of Economics, 217 Persson Hall, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY 13346, and NBER.

出版信息

Res Econ Hist. 2021;37:89-128. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

Abstract

The U. S. fertility transition in the nineteenth century is unusual. Not only did it start from a very high fertility level and very early in the nation's development, but it also took place long before the nation's mortality transition, industrialization, and urbanization. This paper assembles new county-level, household-level, and individual-level data, including new complete-count IPUMS microdata databases of the 1830-1880 censuses, to evaluate different theories for the nineteenth-century American fertility transition. We construct cross-sectional models of net fertility for currently-married white couples in census years 1830-1880 and test the results with a subset of couples linked between the 1850-1860, 1860-1870, and 1870-1880 censuses. We find evidence of marital fertility control consistent with hypotheses as early as 1830. The results indicate support for several different but complementary theories of the early U.S. fertility decline, including the land availability, conventional structuralist, ideational, child demand/quality-quantity tradeoff, and life-cycle savings theories.

摘要

19世纪美国的生育率转变非同寻常。它不仅始于非常高的生育率水平,且在美国发展的早期就已开始,而且发生在该国死亡率转变、工业化和城市化之前很久。本文收集了新的县级、家庭层面和个人层面的数据,包括1830 - 1880年人口普查新的完整计数综合公共使用微观数据数据库,以评估关于19世纪美国生育率转变的不同理论。我们构建了1830 - 1880年人口普查年份中当前已婚白人夫妇的净生育率横截面模型,并用1850 - 1860年、1860 - 1870年和1870 - 1880年人口普查之间相联系的一部分夫妇对结果进行了检验。我们发现早在1830年就有与假设一致的婚内生育控制的证据。结果表明支持美国早期生育率下降的几种不同但相互补充的理论,包括土地可获得性理论、传统结构主义理论、观念理论、儿童需求/质量 - 数量权衡理论和生命周期储蓄理论。

相似文献

2
Fertility decline in the United States, 1850-1930: New Evidence from Complete-Count Datasets.
Ann Demogr Hist (Paris). 2019 Jun;138(2):143-177. doi: 10.3917/adh.138.0143.
3
Ready, Willing, and Able? Impediments to the Onset of Marital Fertility Decline in the United States.
Demography. 2016 Dec;53(6):1657-1692. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0513-7.
4
Fertility in New York State in the pre-Civil War era.
Demography. 2008 May;45(2):345-61. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0009.
5
The Influence of Kin Proximity on the Reproductive Success of American Couples, 1900-1910.
Demography. 2021 Dec 1;58(6):2337-2364. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9518532.
8
Rethinking the "early" decline of marital fertility in the United States.
Demography. 2003 Nov;40(4):605-20. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0035.
9
10
Interoperable and accessible census and survey data from IPUMS.
Sci Data. 2018 Feb 27;5:180007. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Fertility decline in the United States, 1850-1930: New Evidence from Complete-Count Datasets.
Ann Demogr Hist (Paris). 2019 Jun;138(2):143-177. doi: 10.3917/adh.138.0143.
2
Reconstruction of Birth Histories for the Study of Fertility in the United States, 1830-1910.
Hist Methods. 2020;53(1):28-52. doi: 10.1080/01615440.2019.1664357. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Census Technology, Politics, and Institutional Change, 1790-2020.
J Am Hist. 2020 Jun;107(1):19-51. doi: 10.1093/jahist/jaaa007. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Occupation and fertility on the frontier: Evidence from the state of Utah.
Demogr Res. 2014 Jan-Jun;30:853-886. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.29. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
5
Historical Census Record Linkage.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2018 Jul;44:19-37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041447. Epub 2018 May 18.
6
7
Ready, Willing, and Able? Impediments to the Onset of Marital Fertility Decline in the United States.
Demography. 2016 Dec;53(6):1657-1692. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0513-7.
9
A census-based count of the Civil War dead.
Civ War Hist. 2011;57(4):307-48. doi: 10.1353/cwh.2011.0061.
10
New Methods of Census Record Linking.
Hist Methods. 2011 Jan 1;44(1):7-14. doi: 10.1080/01615440.2010.517152.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验