Department of Biofunctional Medicine & Diagnostics of Clinical Korean Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Transdisciplinary Security, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 26;13:772478. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.772478. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of a low-calorie diet (LCD) combined with acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), meal replacements (MR), and exercise on weight loss.
The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CNKI, RISS, and KISS were searched systematically. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared the effect of a low-calorie diet (LCD)-combined acupuncture, CBT, and exercise and an MR-based diet on weight loss with LCD-alone for adults with simple obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 25) published before August 2021 were included in the study. Two investigators extracted and coded the data using a template. Any disagreements between investigators were resolved through discussion. Changes in BMI or weight were transformed to Hedges' g values with a 95% CI, and network meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model were conducted.
A total of thirty-two trials involving 3,364 patients were finally included in the study. The effect sizes of four interventions were medium, in the order of acupuncture (Hedges' g = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.71), CBT (Hedges' g = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.20 - 0.63), MR (Hedges' g = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.19 - 0.45), and exercise (Hedges' g = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.06 - 0.46).In terms of intervention period, acupuncture was effective in the short period (≤ 12 weeks, Hedges' g = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.12 - 0.67) and the long period (>12 weeks, Hedges' g = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.37 - 1.40), whereas CBT (Hedges' g = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.26 - 0.76) and exercise (Hedges' g = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.12 - 0.59) were effective only in the long period. MR was effective only in the short period (Hedges' g = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.18 - 0.53).
This study suggests that acupuncture, CBT, MR, and exercise for simple obesity show a medium effect size, and their effectiveness differs according to the intervention period.
本研究旨在评估低热量饮食(LCD)联合针灸、认知行为疗法(CBT)、代餐(MR)和运动减肥的比较效果。
系统检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、CNKI、RISS 和 KISS 电子数据库。纳入直接比较低热量饮食(LCD)联合针灸、CBT 和运动与单独使用 LCD 对单纯性肥胖(BMI>25)成人减肥效果的随机对照试验(RCT),研究截止日期为 2021 年 8 月前。两名研究者使用模板提取和编码数据。研究者之间的任何分歧均通过讨论解决。使用贝叶斯随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析,将 BMI 或体重的变化转换为 Hedges'g 值及其 95%置信区间。
最终纳入 32 项试验共 3364 例患者。四种干预措施的效应大小均为中等,依次为针灸(Hedges'g=0.48,95%CI=0.25-0.71)、CBT(Hedges'g=0.42,95%CI=0.20-0.63)、MR(Hedges'g=0.32,95%CI=0.19-0.45)和运动(Hedges'g=0.27,95%CI=0.06-0.46)。就干预时间而言,针灸在短期(≤12 周,Hedges'g=0.39,95%CI=0.12-0.67)和长期(>12 周,Hedges'g=0.89,95%CI=0.37-1.40)均有效,而 CBT(Hedges'g=0.51,95%CI=0.26-0.76)和运动(Hedges'g=0.37,95%CI=0.12-0.59)仅在长期有效。MR 仅在短期有效(Hedges'g=0.35,95%CI=0.18-0.53)。
本研究表明,针灸、CBT、MR 和运动治疗单纯性肥胖的效果中等,其疗效因干预时间而异。