Suppr超能文献

为一线医护人员接种疫苗:意大利东北部一项关于急救人员的疫情前横断面研究结果

Vaccinating Front-Line Healthcare Workers: Results of a Pre-Pandemic Cross-Sectional Study from North-Eastern Italy on First Responders.

作者信息

Riccò Matteo, Vezzosi Luigi, Marchesi Federico

机构信息

AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Servizio di Prevenzione e Sicurezza Negli Ambienti di Lavoro (SPSAL), Local Health Unit of Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola n.2, I-42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Agenzia di Tutela della Salute (ATS) della Val Padana, Via dei Toscani n.1, I-46100 Mantua, Italy.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 7;10(9):1492. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091492.

Abstract

First responders are front-line healthcare workers who are potentially exposed to different infectious agents. Characterizing their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) towards immunization, therefore, has the potential to significantly improve occupational health and safety. A cross-sectional study was performed in October 2018 using a sample of 161 first responders from the Parma Province (mean age 45.1 ± 14.1 years; seniority 10.8 ± 8.6 years). The participants were questioned on three recommended vaccinations (i.e., the seasonal influenza, measles, and pertussis vaccines) and on meningococcal vaccines (not officially recommended for first responders). The participant's knowledge status and risk perception were assessed as percentage values through a specifically designed questionnaire. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for factors associated with vaccination status were calculated by means of a binary logistic regression analysis. The internal consistency result, calculated using a general knowledge test, was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.894), but the corresponding score was unsatisfying (46.5% ± 32.4), evidencing uncertainties surrounding the recommendations for measles and meningococcal vaccines (39.1% and 34.2% incorrect answers, respectively). While the large majority of respondents were favorable towards the meningococcal (89.4%), measles (87.5%), and pertussis vaccines (83.0%), 55.3% exhibited a favorable attitude toward the seasonal influenza vaccine, the uptake of which in 2018, was reported by 28.0% of respondents, compared to the self-reported lifetime status for meningitis (26.1%), measles (42.2%), and pertussis (34.8%). Not coincidentally, all assessed infections were associated with a low-risk perception score, particularly influenza (33.9% ± 18.4). Interestingly enough, neither knowledge status nor risk perception were associated with vaccination rates. More precisely, the main predictor for being vaccinated against seasonal influenza in 2018 was a seniority of ≥10 years (aOR 3.26, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.35-7.91), while both pertussis and measles were positively associated with higher educational achievement (aOR 3.27, 95%CI 1.29-8.30; and aOR 2.69, 95%CI 1.09-6.65, respectively). The reasons for vaccination gaps among the sampled first responders, apparently, did not find their roots in inappropriate knowledge status and risk perception alone. However, the very low rates of sampled immunization lead us to recommend stronger and more appropriate information campaigns.

摘要

急救人员是一线医护人员,他们有可能接触到不同的传染源。因此,了解他们对免疫接种的知识、态度和行为(KAP),有可能显著改善职业健康与安全状况。2018年10月进行了一项横断面研究,样本来自帕尔马省的161名急救人员(平均年龄45.1±14.1岁;工作年限10.8±8.6年)。研究人员就三种推荐疫苗接种情况(即季节性流感疫苗、麻疹疫苗和百日咳疫苗)以及脑膜炎球菌疫苗(未正式推荐给急救人员)对参与者进行了询问。通过专门设计的问卷,以百分比值评估参与者的知识水平和风险认知。通过二元逻辑回归分析计算与疫苗接种状况相关因素的调整比值比(aOR)。使用一般知识测试计算的内部一致性结果良好(克朗巴哈系数α=0.894),但相应得分并不理想(46.5%±32.4),这表明围绕麻疹和脑膜炎球菌疫苗的建议存在不确定性(错误答案分别为39.1%和34.2%)。虽然绝大多数受访者对脑膜炎球菌疫苗(89.4%)、麻疹疫苗(87.5%)和百日咳疫苗(83.0%)持赞成态度,但55.3%的受访者对季节性流感疫苗持赞成态度,2018年接种该疫苗的受访者比例为28.0%,相比之下,自我报告的脑膜炎(26.1%)、麻疹(42.2%)和百日咳(34.8%)终身接种状况。并非巧合的是,所有评估的感染都与低风险认知得分相关,尤其是流感(33.9%±18.4)。有趣的是,知识水平和风险认知均与疫苗接种率无关。更确切地说,2018年接种季节性流感疫苗的主要预测因素是工作年限≥10年(aOR 3.26,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.35 - 7.91),而百日咳和麻疹疫苗接种均与较高的教育程度呈正相关(分别为aOR 3.27,95%CI 1.29 - 8.30;以及aOR 2.69,95%CI 1.09 - 6.65)。显然,抽样急救人员中疫苗接种差距的原因并非仅仅源于知识水平不当和风险认知不足。然而,抽样免疫接种率极低,这促使我们建议开展更有力、更合适的宣传活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1866/9503083/15c2dfb9ef71/vaccines-10-01492-g0A1a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验