Nicolini Paola, Lucchi Tiziano, Abbate Carlo, Inglese Silvia, Tomasini Emanuele, Mari Daniela, Rossi Paolo D, Vicenzi Marco
Geriatric Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;14:886023. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.886023. eCollection 2022.
Despite the emerging clinical relevance of heart rate variability (HRV) as a potential biomarker of cognitive decline and as a candidate target for intervention, there is a dearth of research on the prospective relationship between HRV and cognitive change. In particular, no study has addressed this issue in subjects with a diagnosis of cognitive status including cognitive impairment.
To investigate HRV as a predictor of cognitive decline in subjects with normal cognition (NC) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Specifically, we tested the literature-based hypothesis that the HRV response to different physical challenges would predict decline in different cognitive domains.
This longitudinal study represents the approximately 3-year follow-up of a previous cross-sectional study enrolling 80 older outpatients (aged ≥ 65). At baseline, power spectral analysis of HRV was performed on five-minute electrocardiographic recordings at rest and during a sympathetic (active standing) and a parasympathetic (paced breathing) challenge. We focused on normalized HRV measures [normalized low frequency power (LFn) and the low frequency to high frequency power ratio (LF/HF)] and on their dynamic response from rest to challenge (Δ HRV). Extensive neuropsychological testing was used to diagnose cognitive status at baseline and to evaluate cognitive change over the follow-up annualized changes in cognitive Z-scores. The association between Δ HRV and cognitive change was explored by means of linear regression, unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounders.
In subjects diagnosed with MCI at baseline a greater response to a sympathetic challenge predicted a greater decline in episodic memory [adjusted model: Δ LFn, standardized regression coefficient (β) = -0.528, = 0.019; Δ LF/HF, β = -0.643, = 0.001] whereas a greater response to a parasympathetic challenge predicted a lesser decline in executive functioning (adjusted model: Δ LFn, β = -0.716, < 0.001; Δ LF/HF, β = -0.935, < 0.001).
Our findings provide novel insight into the link between HRV and cognition in MCI. They contribute to a better understanding of the heart-brain connection, but will require replication in larger cohorts.
尽管心率变异性(HRV)作为认知能力下降的潜在生物标志物以及干预的候选靶点,其临床相关性日益凸显,但关于HRV与认知变化之间的前瞻性关系的研究却很匮乏。特别是,尚无研究在包括认知障碍在内的具有认知状态诊断的受试者中探讨这一问题。
研究HRV作为正常认知(NC)或轻度认知障碍(MCI)受试者认知能力下降的预测指标。具体而言,我们检验了基于文献的假设,即HRV对不同身体挑战的反应可预测不同认知领域的下降。
这项纵向研究是对之前一项纳入80名老年门诊患者(年龄≥65岁)的横断面研究进行的约3年随访。在基线时,对静息状态以及交感神经(主动站立)和副交感神经(呼吸起搏)挑战期间的5分钟心电图记录进行HRV的功率谱分析。我们重点关注标准化的HRV指标[标准化低频功率(LFn)和低频与高频功率比(LF/HF)]及其从静息到挑战的动态反应(ΔHRV)。采用广泛的神经心理学测试在基线时诊断认知状态,并在随访期间评估认知变化(认知Z评分的年化变化)。通过线性回归探索ΔHRV与认知变化之间的关联,未调整以及针对潜在混杂因素进行调整。
在基线时被诊断为MCI的受试者中,对交感神经挑战的更大反应预示着情景记忆的更大下降[调整模型:ΔLFn,标准化回归系数(β)=-0.528,P = 0.019;ΔLF/HF,β=-0.643,P = 0.001],而对副交感神经挑战的更大反应预示着执行功能的下降较小(调整模型:ΔLFn,β=-0.716,P<0.001;ΔLF/HF,β=-0.935,P<0.001)。
我们的研究结果为MCI中HRV与认知之间的联系提供了新的见解。它们有助于更好地理解心脑连接,但需要在更大的队列中进行重复验证。