Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, 72042University of Pretoria, Arcadia, South Africa.
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Therapeutic Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Qual Health Res. 2022 Nov;32(13):2030-2039. doi: 10.1177/10497323221130832. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
In qualitative research, researchers often conduct semi-structured interviews with people familiar to them, but there are limited guidelines for researchers who conduct interviews to obtain curriculum-related information with academic colleagues who work in the same area of practice but at different higher education institutions. Using a pragmatic constructivist stance, we address the practicalities of conducting semi-structured interviews with fellow educators who work in the same area of professional practice, where the researcher has to address the dual roles of "insider" and "outsider" as well as that of researcher and participant. Interviewing academic colleagues offers a unique opportunity for rich data collection, but researchers should adopt a flexible conversational style during interviewing within research parameters and be acutely aware of their positionality and fluidity of roles. This article contributes to existing knowledge by drawing on the work of previous scholars in various areas of research and research methodology thereby offering a practical and theoretical perspective on conducting qualitative research interviewing in higher education institutions where the role of researcher and participant can become blurred. These guidelines and insights will also benefit researchers who conduct research with peers who work together in the same area of expertise, in similar contexts and with whom there are varying levels of working relationships.
在定性研究中,研究人员通常会与熟悉的人进行半结构化访谈,但对于那些与在同一实践领域工作但在不同高等教育机构工作的学术同事进行访谈以获取课程相关信息的研究人员来说,相关指南有限。我们采用实用建构主义立场,解决了与从事同一专业实践领域的教育工作者进行半结构化访谈的实际问题,在这种情况下,研究人员必须应对“内部人员”和“外部人员”以及研究人员和参与者这两种双重角色。与学术同事进行访谈为丰富数据收集提供了独特的机会,但研究人员应在研究参数内的访谈中采用灵活的对话方式,并敏锐地意识到自己的立场和角色的流动性。本文通过借鉴各个研究领域和研究方法的先前学者的工作,为在高等教育机构中进行定性研究访谈提供了实用和理论视角,从而为研究人员和参与者的角色可能变得模糊的情况做出了贡献。这些准则和见解也将使与在同一专业领域、类似背景下工作且工作关系程度不同的同行一起进行研究的研究人员受益。