Raywood Emma, Shannon Harriet, Filipow Nicole, Tanriver Gizem, Stanojevic Sanja, Kapoor Kunal, Douglas Helen, O'Connor Rachel, Murray Nicky, Black Bridget, Main Eleanor
Physiotherapy, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University Halifax, Canada.
J Cyst Fibros. 2023 Mar;22(2):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
Children and young people with CF (CYPwCF) get advice about using positive expiratory pressure (PEP) or oscillating PEP (OPEP) devices to clear sticky mucus from their lungs. However, little is known about the quantity (number of treatments, breaths, or sets) or quality (breath pressures and lengths) of these daily airway clearance techniques (ACTs) undertaken at home. This study used electronic pressure sensors to record real time breath-by-breath data from 145 CYPwCF (6-16y) during routine ACTs over 2 months. ACT quantity and quality were benchmarked against individual prescriptions and accepted recommendations for device use. In total 742,084 breaths from 9,081 treatments were recorded. Individual CYPwCF maintained consistent patterns of ACT quantity and quality over time. Overall, 60% of CYPwCF did at least half their prescribed treatments, while 27% did fewer than a quarter. About 77% of pre-teens did the right number of daily treatments compared with only 56% of teenagers. CYPwCF usually did the right number of breaths. ACT quality (recommended breath length and pressure) varied between participants and depended on device. Breath pressures, lengths and pressure-length relationships were significantly different between ACT devices. PEP devices encouraged longer breaths with lower pressures, while OPEP devices encouraged shorter breaths with higher pressures. More breaths per treatment were within advised ranges for both pressure and length using PEP (30-31%) than OPEP devices (1-3%). Objective measures of quantity and quality may help to optimise ACT device selection and support CYPwCF to do regular effective ACTs.
患有囊性纤维化的儿童和青少年(CYPwCF)会得到关于使用呼气末正压(PEP)或振荡呼气末正压(OPEP)设备来清除肺部黏稠黏液的建议。然而,对于这些在家中进行的日常气道清除技术(ACTs)的数量(治疗次数、呼吸次数或组数)或质量(呼吸压力和时长)却知之甚少。本研究使用电子压力传感器,在2个月的常规ACT期间记录了145名6至16岁的CYPwCF的实时逐次呼吸数据。ACT的数量和质量以个人处方和设备使用的公认建议为基准。总共记录了来自9081次治疗的742,084次呼吸。随着时间的推移,个体CYPwCF保持了一致的ACT数量和质量模式。总体而言,60%的CYPwCF完成了至少一半的规定治疗,而27%的人完成的治疗少于四分之一。与只有56%的青少年相比,约77%的青春期前儿童进行了正确数量的每日治疗。CYPwCF通常呼吸次数正确。ACT的质量(建议的呼吸时长和压力)因参与者而异,并取决于设备。ACT设备之间的呼吸压力、时长以及压力-时长关系存在显著差异。PEP设备鼓励在较低压力下进行较长时间的呼吸,而OPEP设备则鼓励在较高压力下进行较短时间的呼吸。使用PEP(30 - 31%)时,每次治疗中更多的呼吸次数在压力和时长的建议范围内,而使用OPEP设备时这一比例为1 - 3%。数量和质量的客观测量可能有助于优化ACT设备的选择,并支持CYPwCF进行定期有效的ACT。