Shamil P K, Gupta N K, Ish Pranav, Sen M K, Kumar Rohit, Chakrabarti Shibdas, Gupta Nitesh
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep;26(9):1000-1005. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24316.
Diaphragmatic dysfunction has been increasingly documented to play a critical role to determine ventilator dependency and failure of weaning.
The goal was to study the diagnostic accuracy of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI) as a predictor of weaning outcomes in comparison to RSBI.
A prospective observational study on consecutively admitted patients who were intubated and mechanically ventilated for a duration of at least 48 hours was carried out. The right hemidiaphragm displacement [diaphragm displacement (DD)] was calculated by M-mode ultrasonography, and respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (TV) were documented from the ventilator readings. Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) was measured as RR/TV (in liters); D-RSBI was calculated as RR/DD (in millimeters) and expressed as breath/minute/millimeter. Extubation failure was defined as the reinstitution of mechanical ventilation at the end of, or during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), re-intubation or the need of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the patient within 48 hours of extubation.
Of 101 screened patients, 50 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 45 patients had successful SBT, and finally, 41 patients could be successfully extubated. Hence, the overall rate of weaning failure in the study population was 18%. The areas under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for D-RSBI and RSBI were 0.97 and 0.70, respectively ( <0.0001). The Pearson's correlation among RSBI and D-RSBI was 0.81 (-value <0.001).
Diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index has a positive correlation and greater diagnostic accuracy than RSBI, the conventional weaning index.
Shamil PK, Gupta NK, Ish P, Sen MK, Kumar R, Chakrabarti S, . Prediction of Weaning Outcome from Mechanical Ventilation Using Diaphragmatic Rapid Shallow Breathing Index. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(9):1000-1005.
越来越多的文献表明,膈肌功能障碍在决定呼吸机依赖和撤机失败方面起着关键作用。
本研究旨在比较膈肌快速浅呼吸指数(D-RSBI)与传统快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)作为撤机结果预测指标的诊断准确性。
对连续收治的、接受气管插管并机械通气至少48小时的患者进行前瞻性观察研究。通过M型超声计算右侧半膈肌位移[膈肌位移(DD)],并从呼吸机读数中记录呼吸频率(RR)和潮气量(TV)。快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)按RR/TV(升)计算;D-RSBI按RR/DD(毫米)计算,单位为次/分钟/毫米。拔管失败定义为在自主呼吸试验(SBT)结束时或期间重新进行机械通气、重新插管或在拔管后48小时内患者需要无创通气(NIV)。
在101例筛查患者中,50例符合纳入标准,其中45例成功完成SBT,最终41例成功拔管。因此,研究人群的总体撤机失败率为18%。D-RSBI和RSBI的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积分别为0.97和0.70(<0.0001)。RSBI与D-RSBI的Pearson相关性为0.81(P值<0.001)。
膈肌快速浅呼吸指数与传统撤机指数RSBI相比具有正相关性和更高的诊断准确性。
Shamil PK, Gupta NK, Ish P, Sen MK, Kumar R, Chakrabarti S, . 使用膈肌快速浅呼吸指数预测机械通气撤机结果。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2022;26(9):1000 - 1005。