Chan Kai Siang, Junnarkar Sameer Padmakumar, Wang Bei, Tan Yen Pin, Low Jee Keem, Huey Cheong Wei Terence, Shelat Vishalkumar Girishchandra
Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Nov 30;26(4):375-385. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-028. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Prehabilitation aims for preoperative optimisation to reduce postoperative complications. However, there is a paucity of data on its use in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Thus, this study aims to evaluate the outcomes of a home-based outpatient prehabilitation program (PP) versus no-PP in patients undergoing PD.
This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent PP versus no-PP before elective PD from January 2016 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria for PP were < 65 years or 65-74 years with FRAIL score < 3. No-PP included dietician, case manager and anesthesia review. PP included additional physiotherapy sessions, caregiver training and interim phone consultation. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate length of stay (LOS), morbidity, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality.
Seventy-one patients (PP: n = 50 [70.4%]; no-PP: n = 21 [29.6%]) were included in this study. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-72 years). Majority (n = 58 [81.7%]) of patients underwent open surgery. Ductal adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (49.3%). Patient demographics were comparable between both groups. Overall median LOS was 11.0 days (IQR: 8.0-17.0 days). Compared to no-PP, PP was not independently associated with reduced intra-abdominal collections (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-6.11, = 0.532), major morbidity (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.09-19.47; = 0.845) or 30-day readmission (OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 0.26-38.27; = 0.365). There was one (1.4%) 30-day mortality.
Our outpatient PP with unsupervised exercise regimes did not improve postoperative outcomes following elective PD.
背景/目的:术前康复旨在实现术前优化,以减少术后并发症。然而,关于其在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)患者中的应用数据匮乏。因此,本研究旨在评估居家门诊术前康复计划(PP)与无PP方案对接受PD手术患者的治疗效果。
这项回顾性队列研究比较了2016年1月至2020年12月期间接受择期PD手术前接受PP与未接受PP的患者。PP的纳入标准为年龄<65岁或65 - 74岁且衰弱评分<3。未接受PP组包括营养师、病例管理员和麻醉评估。PP组还包括额外的物理治疗课程、护理人员培训和中期电话咨询。采用单因素和多因素分析来评估住院时间(LOS)、发病率、30天再入院率和90天死亡率。
本研究纳入了71例患者(PP组:n = 50 [70.4%];未接受PP组:n = 2l [29.6%])。中位年龄为65岁(四分位间距[IQR]:58 - 72岁)。大多数患者(n = 58 [81.7%])接受了开放手术。导管腺癌是最常见的组织学类型(49.3%)。两组患者的人口统计学特征具有可比性。总体中位住院时间为11.0天(IQR:8.0 - 17.0天)。与未接受PP组相比,PP组与腹腔内积液减少(优势比[OR]:0.43;95%置信区间[CI]:0.03 - 6.11,P = 0.532)、严重并发症(OR:1.31;95% CI:0.09 - 19.47;P = 0.845)或30天再入院率(OR:3.16;95% CI:0.26 - 38.27;P = 0.365)无独立相关性。有1例(1.4%)30天死亡率。
我们的门诊PP方案结合无监督锻炼方式并未改善择期PD术后的治疗效果。