Suppr超能文献

新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗对比单纯化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的疗效:倾向评分匹配研究

Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 7;13:970534. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.970534. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Clinical studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) have been carried out for the resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). So far, few studies have compared the survival outcomes of nCT plus ICIs and nCT alone. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs combined with nCT versus nCT followed by esophagectomy for patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of ESCC patients underwent nCT or nCT combined with ICIs followed by esophagectomy (from March 2013 to April 2021) was performed. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.01 was conducted to balance potential bias.

RESULTS

A total of 47 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCT combined with ICIs were selected for the final analysis. The tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the nCT+ICIs group were significantly higher than those of the nCT group (21.7% vs. 4.5%, =0.016; and 17.0% vs. 2.1%, =0.035, respectively). The rate of nerve invasion was 4.3% in the nCT+ICIs group, significantly lower than 23.4% of the nCT group (=0.007). The incidences of adverse events in the nCT+ICIs group were similar compared with the nCT group and there was no grade 5 toxicity in either group. The 1-, 2-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 95.7%, 80.7% and 76.1%, 63.8% in the two groups (=0.001, and =0.046, respectively). The 1-year OS was improved in the nCT+ICIs group, which was close to a statistical difference (95.7% vs. 84.8%, =0.074). Local recurrence rate in the nCT+ICIs group was 6.4%, significantly lower than 21.3% of the nCT group (=0.036), while there was no significant difference in the distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nCT alone, neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus nCT for patients with locally advanced ESCC has an advantage in pathological response, and could improve DFS with a good safety and feasibility, while long term survival validation is still needed further.

摘要

目的

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合新辅助化疗(nCT)在可切除食管鳞癌(ESCC)中的临床研究已经开展。到目前为止,很少有研究比较 nCT 联合 ICI 与单纯 nCT 的生存结果。本研究旨在比较新辅助联合 ICI 与 nCT 后行切除术治疗可切除局部晚期 ESCC 患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

对 2013 年 3 月至 2021 年 4 月接受 nCT 或 nCT 联合 ICI 后行切除术(ESCC)的患者进行回顾性分析。采用卡尺为 0.01 的 1:1 倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡潜在偏倚。

结果

共纳入 47 对接受 nCT 和 nCT 联合 ICI 的可比较 ESCC 患者进行最终分析。nCT+ICIs 组的肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)0 级和病理完全缓解(pCR)率显著高于 nCT 组(21.7%比 4.5%,=0.016;17.0%比 2.1%,=0.035)。nCT+ICIs 组的神经侵犯率为 4.3%,明显低于 nCT 组的 23.4%(=0.007)。nCT+ICIs 组不良反应发生率与 nCT 组相似,两组均无 5 级毒性。两组 1 年、2 年无病生存率(DFS)分别为 95.7%、80.7%和 76.1%、63.8%(=0.001,=0.046)。nCT+ICIs 组 1 年 OS 有所改善,接近统计学差异(95.7%比 84.8%,=0.074)。nCT+ICIs 组局部复发率为 6.4%,明显低于 nCT 组的 21.3%(=0.036),而远处转移无显著差异。

结论

与单纯 nCT 相比,新辅助免疫治疗联合 nCT 治疗局部晚期 ESCC 在病理反应方面具有优势,可改善 DFS,且具有良好的安全性和可行性,但其长期生存仍需进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c8e/9585292/0abd94118035/fimmu-13-970534-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验