Suppr超能文献

造血干细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病:系统评价概述。

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Binwen Road 548#, China.

Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Youdian Road 46#, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Oct 7;2022:1828223. doi: 10.1155/2022/1828223. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become the main treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has been studied in many systematic reviews (SRs), but strong conclusions have not been drawn yet.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to summarize and critically evaluate the methodological and evidence quality of SRs and meta-analysis on this topic.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for SRs/meta-analyses regarding HSCT for AML. Two reviewers assessed the quality of SRs/meta-analyses in line with AMSTAR-2 and evaluated the strength of evidence quality with the grading of the evaluation system (GRADE) for concerned outcomes independently.

RESULTS

12 SR/Meta articles were included, and the AMSTAR-2 scale showed that the quality grade of all articles was low or very low. GRADE results showed 29 outcomes, 2 of which were high, 12 were moderate, and 15 were low. Limitations and inconsistency were the most important factors leading to degradation, followed by imprecision and publication bias. Allo-SCT had better OS and DFS benefits than auto-SCT and significantly reduced the relapse in intermediate-risk AML/CR1 patients. Auto-SCT was associated with lower TRM than allo-SCT but generally had higher relapse. The results should be confirmed further for the low or moderate evidence quality.

CONCLUSION

Current SRs show that allo-SCT in the treatment of AML might improve the OS, RFS, and DFS. Auto-SCT has significantly lower TRM but higher RR. Whether bone marrow transplantation is superior to nonmyeloablative chemotherapy remains to be evaluated. Meanwhile, the quality of methodology needs to be further improved. The intensity of evidence was uneven, and the high-quality evidence of outcomes was lacking. Considering the limitations of our overview, more rigorous and scientific studies are needed to fully explore the efficacy of different interventions of HSCT in AML, and clinicians should be more cautious in the treatment.

摘要

背景

造血干细胞移植(HSCT)已成为急性髓系白血病(AML)的主要治疗方法,并在许多系统评价(SRs)中进行了研究,但尚未得出明确的结论。

目的

本研究旨在总结和批判性评估关于 HSCT 治疗 AML 的 SR 和荟萃分析的方法学和证据质量。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 中关于 AML 造血干细胞移植的 SR/荟萃分析。两名评审员根据 AMSTAR-2 标准评估 SR/荟萃分析的质量,并独立评估相关结局的证据质量强度,采用评估系统(GRADE)分级。

结果

共纳入 12 篇 SR/荟萃分析文章,AMSTAR-2 量表显示所有文章的质量等级均为低或极低。GRADE 结果显示 29 个结局,其中 2 个为高,12 个为中,15 个为低。局限性和不一致性是导致降级的最重要因素,其次是不精确性和发表偏倚。与 auto-SCT 相比,allo-SCT 具有更好的 OS 和 DFS 获益,并显著降低了中危 AML/CR1 患者的复发率。与 allo-SCT 相比,auto-SCT 与较低的 TRM 相关,但总体复发率较高。鉴于证据质量较低或中等,结果需要进一步确认。

结论

目前的 SR 表明,AML 治疗中 allo-SCT 可能改善 OS、RFS 和 DFS。与 allo-SCT 相比,auto-SCT 的 TRM 显著降低,但 RR 较高。骨髓移植是否优于非清髓性化疗仍有待评估。同时,方法学的质量需要进一步提高。证据强度不均匀,缺乏高等级证据。考虑到本综述的局限性,需要进行更严格和科学的研究,以充分探索 HSCT 在 AML 中不同干预措施的疗效,临床医生在治疗中应更加谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0bb/9568333/a0fe2e24fcf1/IJCLP2022-1828223.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验