Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease and National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
First Clinical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2239778. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39778.
A considerable number of clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal cancer are emerging. However, systematic evaluations of these studies are lacking.
To provide state-of-the-art evidence and normative theoretical support for neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant original articles and conference proceedings that were published in English through April 1, 2022.
Published phase 2 or 3 clinical trials that included patients with resectable stage I to IV esophageal cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before surgery as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for meta-analysis were followed to extract data. A random-effects model was adopted if the heterogeneity was significant (I2 statistic >50%); otherwise, the common-effects model was used. Data analyses were conducted from April 2 to 8, 2022.
Pathological complete response (pCR) rate and major pathological response (MPR) rate were considered to be the primary outcomes calculated for the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was set as the major measure for the safety outcome. The rate of R0 surgical resection was summarized. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to histologic subtype and ICI types.
A total of 27 clinical trials with 815 patients were included. Pooled rates were 31.4% (95% CI, 27.6%-35.3%) for pCR and 48.9% (95% CI, 42.0-55.9%) for MCR in patients with esophageal cancer. In terms of safety, the pooled incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was 26.9% (95% CI, 16.7%-38.3%). Most patients achieved R0 surgical resection (98.6%; 95% CI, 97.1%-99.6%). Regarding histologic subtypes, the pooled pCR rates were 32.4% (95% CI, 28.2%-36.8%) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 25.2% (95% CI, 16.3%-35.1%) in esophageal adenocarcinoma. The pooled MPR rate was 49.4% (95% CI, 42.1%-56.7%) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
This study found that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy had promising clinical and safety outcomes for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are warranted to validate the findings and benefits of ICIs.
越来越多的新辅助免疫治疗局部可切除食管鳞癌的临床试验正在涌现。然而,这些研究的系统评价仍然缺乏。
为局部晚期可切除食管鳞癌的新辅助免疫治疗提供最新的证据和规范的理论支持。
通过 2022 年 4 月 1 日检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库,查找发表在英文期刊上的相关原始文章和会议论文。
纳入了接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)作为单一药物或联合其他治疗作为新辅助治疗的可切除 I 期至 IV 期食管鳞癌患者的已发表的 2 期或 3 期临床试验。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目以及观察性研究荟萃分析的指南进行数据提取。如果存在显著异质性(I2 统计量>50%),则采用随机效应模型;否则,采用固定效应模型。数据分析于 2022 年 4 月 2 日至 8 日进行。
病理完全缓解(pCR)率和主要病理缓解(MPR)率被认为是新辅助免疫治疗临床结局的主要观察指标。治疗相关严重不良事件的发生率被设定为安全性结局的主要指标。总结 R0 手术切除率。根据组织学亚型和 ICI 类型进行亚组分析。
共纳入 27 项临床试验,共计 815 例患者。食管癌患者的 pCR 率和 MPR 率的合并率分别为 31.4%(95%可信区间,27.6%-35.3%)和 48.9%(95%可信区间,42.0-55.9%)。在安全性方面,治疗相关严重不良事件的合并发生率为 26.9%(95%可信区间,16.7%-38.3%)。大多数患者达到了 R0 手术切除(98.6%;95%可信区间,97.1%-99.6%)。在组织学亚型方面,食管鳞癌的 pCR 率为 32.4%(95%可信区间,28.2%-36.8%),食管腺癌的 pCR 率为 25.2%(95%可信区间,16.3%-35.1%)。食管鳞癌的 MPR 率为 49.4%(95%可信区间,42.1%-56.7%)。
本研究发现,新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗对可切除食管癌患者具有良好的临床和安全性结局。需要进行随机临床试验并进行长期随访,以验证 ICIs 的发现和获益。