Brown Zachary J, Heh Victor, Labiner Hanna E, Brock Guy N, Ejaz Aslam, Dillhoff Mary, Tsung Allan, Pawlik Timothy M, Cloyd Jordan M
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Biomedical Informatics and Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Br J Surg. 2022 Dec 13;110(1):34-42. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac354.
Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used before surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Given the importance of completing multimodal therapy, the aim of this study was to characterize surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the reasons for, and long-term prognostic impact of, not undergoing resection.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials and high-quality retrospective studies since 2010 was performed to calculate pooled resection rates using a generalized random-effects model for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Median survival times were calculated using random-effects models for patients who did and did not undergo resection.
In 125 studies that met the inclusion criteria, neoadjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy (36.8 per cent), chemoradiation (15.2 per cent), or chemotherapy and radiation (48.0 per cent). Among 11 713 patients, the pooled resection rates were 77.4 (95 per cent c.i. 71.3 to 82.5), 60.6 (54.8 to 66.1), and 22.2 (16.7 to 29.0) per cent for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer respectively. The most common reasons for not undergoing resection were distant progression for resectable and borderline resectable cancers, and local unresectability for locally advanced disease. Among 42 studies with survival data available, achieving surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival for patients with potentially resectable (median 38.5 versus 13.3 months), borderline resectable (32.3 versus 13.9 months), and locally advanced (30.0 versus 14.6 months) pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001 for all).
Although rates of surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy vary based on anatomical stage, surgery is associated with improved survival for all patients with localized pancreatic cancer. These pooled resection and survival rates may inform patient-provider decision-making and serve as important benchmarks for future prospective trials.
新辅助治疗越来越多地用于局部胰腺癌的手术前。鉴于完成多模式治疗的重要性,本研究的目的是描述新辅助治疗后的手术切除率,以及未进行切除的原因和长期预后影响。
对2010年以来的前瞻性试验和高质量回顾性研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,使用广义随机效应模型计算潜在可切除、边界可切除和局部晚期胰腺癌的汇总切除率。对接受和未接受切除的患者,使用随机效应模型计算中位生存时间。
在符合纳入标准的125项研究中,新辅助治疗包括化疗(36.8%)、放化疗(15.2%)或化疗联合放疗(48.0%)。在11713例患者中,潜在可切除、边界可切除和局部晚期胰腺癌的汇总切除率分别为77.4%(95%置信区间71.3至82.5)、60.6%(54.8至66.1)和22.2%(16.7至29.0)。未进行切除的最常见原因是可切除和边界可切除癌症的远处进展,以及局部晚期疾病的局部不可切除。在42项有生存数据的研究中,新辅助治疗后实现手术切除与潜在可切除(中位38.5个月对13.3个月)、边界可切除(32.3个月对13.9个月)和局部晚期(30.0个月对14.6个月)胰腺癌患者的生存改善相关(所有P<0.001)。
尽管新辅助治疗后的手术切除率因解剖分期而异,但手术与所有局部胰腺癌患者的生存改善相关。这些汇总的切除率和生存率可为患者与医疗服务提供者的决策提供参考,并作为未来前瞻性试验的重要基准。