Kyriakoudi Anna, Pontikis Konstantinos, Valsami Georgia, Avgeropoulou Stavrina, Neroutsos Efthymios, Christodoulou Eirini, Moraitou Eleni, Markantonis Sophia L, Dokoumetzidis Aristides, Rello Jordi, Koutsoukou Antonia
Intensive Care Unit, 1st Department of Pulmonology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital for the Diseases of the Chest "I Sotiria", 11527 Athens, Greece.
Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 1;11(11):1528. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111528.
Rising antimicrobial resistance has led to a revived interest in inhaled colistin treatment in the critically ill patient with ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI). Nebulization via vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMNs) is considered the current standard-of-care, yet the use of generic jet nebulizers (JNs) is more widespread. Few data exist on the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of colistin when administered through VMNs, while there is a complete paucity regarding the use of JNs. In this study, 18 VARI patients who received 2 million international units of inhaled colistimethate sodium (CMS) through a VMN were pharmacokinetically compared with six VARI patients who received the same drug dose through a JN, in the absence of systemic CMS administration. Surprisingly, VMN and JN led to comparable formed colistin exposures in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) (median (IQR) AUC: 86.2 (46.0-185.9) mg/L∙h with VMN and 91.5 (78.1-110.3) mg/L∙h with JN). The maximum ELF concentration was 10.4 (4.7-22.6) mg/L and 7.4 (6.2-10.3) mg/L, respectively. Based on our results, JN might be considered a viable alternative to the theoretically superior VMN. Therapeutic drug monitoring in the ELF can be advised due to the observed low exposure, high variability, and appreciable systemic absorption.
日益增加的抗菌药物耐药性使得人们对吸入性多黏菌素治疗呼吸机相关性呼吸道感染(VARI)的重症患者重新产生了兴趣。通过振动筛孔雾化器(VMN)进行雾化被认为是当前的标准治疗方法,但普通喷射雾化器(JN)的使用更为广泛。关于通过VMN给药时多黏菌素在肺内的药代动力学数据很少,而关于JN的使用则完全缺乏相关数据。在本研究中,18例通过VMN接受200万国际单位吸入性多黏菌素甲磺酸钠(CMS)的VARI患者与6例在未进行全身性CMS给药情况下通过JN接受相同药物剂量的VARI患者进行了药代动力学比较。令人惊讶的是,VMN和JN在上皮衬液(ELF)中导致的多黏菌素暴露量相当(中位数(四分位间距)AUC:VMN为86.2(46.0 - 185.9)mg/L∙h,JN为91.5(78.1 - 110.3)mg/L∙h)。ELF中的最大浓度分别为10.4(4.7 - 22.6)mg/L和7.4(6.2 - 10.3)mg/L。基于我们的结果,JN可能被认为是理论上更优的VMN的可行替代方案。鉴于观察到的低暴露、高变异性和明显的全身吸收情况,建议对ELF进行治疗药物监测。