Suppr超能文献

双侧超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞与伤口浸润用于腰椎融合手术术后镇痛的随机对照试验

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhang Zhen, Zhu Ran-Lyu, Yue Lei, Li Xue, Ma Jia-Hui, Kong Hao, Li Chun-de, Zhang Hong, Wang Dong-Xin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.

Orthopedic Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Jan;32(1):301-312. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07453-y. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Both erector spinae plane block and wound infiltration are used to improve analgesia following spinal fusion surgery. Herein, we compared the analgesic effect of bilateral erector spinae plane block with wound infiltration in this patient population.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, 60 patients scheduled for elective open posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block before incision (n = 30) or wound infiltration at the end of surgery (n = 30). Both groups received standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, including patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil and no background infusion. Opioid consumption and pain intensity were assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption within 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

All 60 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The equivalent dose of sufentanil consumption within 24 h was significantly lower in patients given erector spinae plane block (median 11 μg, interquartile range 5-16) than in those given wound infiltration (20 μg, 10 to 43; median difference - 10 μg, 95% CI - 18 to - 3, P = 0.007). The cumulative number of demanded PCA boluses was significantly lower with erector spinae plane block at 6 h (median difference - 2, 95% CI - 3 to 0, P = 0.006), 12 h (- 3, 95% CI - 6 to - 1, P = 0.002), and 24 h (- 5, 95% CI - 8 to - 2, P = 0.005) postoperatively. The proportion given rescue analgesia was also significantly lower in patients given erector spinae plane block group within 48 h (relative risk 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.96, P = 0.037). There were no statistical differences in pain intensity at any timepoints between groups. No procedure-related adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with wound infiltration, bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block decreases short-term opioid consumption while providing similar analgesia in patients following lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100053008.

摘要

目的

竖脊肌平面阻滞和伤口浸润均用于改善脊柱融合手术后的镇痛效果。在此,我们比较了双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞与伤口浸润在该患者群体中的镇痛效果。

方法

在这项随机试验中,60例计划进行择期开放性后路腰椎椎间融合手术的患者被随机分为两组,一组在切口前接受超声引导下双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(n = 30),另一组在手术结束时进行伤口浸润(n = 30)。两组均接受标准化全身麻醉和术后镇痛,包括舒芬太尼患者自控镇痛且无背景输注。在术后2、6、12、24和48小时评估阿片类药物消耗量和疼痛强度。主要结局是术后24小时内的累积阿片类药物消耗量。

结果

所有60例患者均纳入意向性分析。接受竖脊肌平面阻滞的患者术后24小时内舒芬太尼等效剂量消耗量显著低于接受伤口浸润的患者(中位数11μg,四分位间距5 - 16)(20μg,10至43;中位数差异 - 10μg,95%CI - 18至 - 3,P = 0.007)。术后6小时(中位数差异 - 2,95%CI - 3至0,P = 0.006)、12小时( - 3,95%CI - 6至 - 1,P = 0.002)和24小时( - 5,95%CI - 8至 - 2,P = 0.005),竖脊肌平面阻滞组所需PCA推注的累积次数显著更低。在48小时内,接受竖脊肌平面阻滞组的患者接受补救性镇痛的比例也显著更低(相对风险0.27,95%CI 0.07至0.96,P = 0.037)。两组在任何时间点的疼痛强度均无统计学差异。未发生与操作相关的不良事件。

结论

与伤口浸润相比,双侧超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞可减少腰椎脊柱融合手术后患者的短期阿片类药物消耗量,同时提供相似的镇痛效果。中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2100053008。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验