Suppr超能文献

MomsTalkShots,一款定制化的教育应用,改善了疫苗态度:一项随机对照试验。

MomsTalkShots, tailored educational app, improves vaccine attitudes: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, W5041, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Institute for Vaccine Safety, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):2134. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14498-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many pregnant women and parents have concerns about vaccines. This analysis examined the impact of MomsTalkShots, an individually tailored educational application, on vaccine attitudes of pregnant women and mothers.

METHODS

MomsTalkShots was the patient-level component of a multi-level intervention to improve maternal and infant vaccine uptake that also included provider- and practice-level interventions. The impact of these interventions was studied using a two-by-two factorial design, randomizing at both the patient- and the practice-level. Study staff recruited pregnant women from a diverse set of prenatal care practices in Colorado and Georgia between June 2017 and July 2018. All participants (n = 2087) received a baseline survey of maternal and infant vaccine intentions and attitudes, and two follow-up surveys at least 1 month and 1 year after their infant's birth, respectively. Half of participants (n = 1041) were randomly assigned to receive educational videos through MomsTalkShots, algorithmically tailored to their vaccine intentions, attitudes, and demographics. Since the practice/provider intervention did not appear impactful, this analysis focused on MomsTalkShots regardless of the practice/provider intervention.

RESULTS

By 1 month post-birth, MomsTalkShots increased perceived risk of maternal influenza disease (61% among MomsTalkShots recipients vs 55% among controls; Odds Ratio: 1.61, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.23-2.09), confidence in influenza vaccine efficacy (73% vs 63%; OR: 1.97, 95%CI: 1.47-2.65), and perceived vaccine knowledge (55% vs 48%; OR: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.13-1.72). Among those intending not to vaccinate at baseline, MomsTalkShots increased perceived risk of maternal influenza disease (38% vs 32%; OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.15-3.71) and confidence in influenza vaccine efficacy (44% vs 28%; OR: 2.62, 95%CI: 1.46-4.69). By 1 year post-birth, MomsTalkShots increased perceived vaccine knowledge (62% vs 50%; OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.36-2.24) and trust in vaccine information from obstetricians and pediatricians (64% vs 55%; OR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.17-2.00). Among those uncertain about vaccinating at baseline, MomsTalkShots increased perceived vaccine knowledge (47% vs 12%; OR: 6.89, 95%CI: 1.52-31.25) and reduced infant vaccine safety concerns (71% vs 91%; OR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.06-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

MomsTalkShots improved pregnant women's and mothers' knowledge and perceptions of maternal and infant vaccines and the diseases they prevent, and offers a scalable tool to address vaccine hesitancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 13/09/2016 (registration number: NCT02898688).

摘要

背景

许多孕妇和家长对疫苗存在担忧。本分析研究了 MomsTalkShots(一种个性化教育应用程序)对孕妇和母亲疫苗态度的影响。

方法

MomsTalkShots 是一项多层面干预措施的患者层面组成部分,该措施旨在提高母婴疫苗接种率,同时还包括提供者和实践层面的干预措施。使用两因素析因设计研究这些干预措施的影响,在患者和实践两个层面上进行随机化。研究人员于 2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 7 月期间从科罗拉多州和佐治亚州的各种产前护理实践中招募了孕妇。所有参与者(n=2087)均接受了关于母婴疫苗接种意向和态度的基线调查,并在婴儿出生后至少 1 个月和 1 年进行了两次随访调查。一半的参与者(n=1041)随机分配通过 MomsTalkShots 接收教育视频,这些视频是根据他们的疫苗接种意向、态度和人口统计学量身定制的。由于实践/提供者干预似乎没有效果,因此本分析专注于 MomsTalkShots,而不考虑实践/提供者干预。

结果

在婴儿出生后 1 个月时,MomsTalkShots 增加了母亲患流感疾病的感知风险(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 61%,而对照组中有 55%;优势比:1.61,95%置信区间:1.23-2.09)、对流感疫苗效力的信心(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 73%,而对照组中有 63%;优势比:1.97,95%置信区间:1.47-2.65)和对疫苗知识的感知(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 55%,而对照组中有 48%;优势比:1.39,95%置信区间:1.13-1.72)。在基线时打算不接种疫苗的参与者中,MomsTalkShots 增加了母亲患流感疾病的感知风险(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 38%,而对照组中有 32%;优势比:2.07,95%置信区间:1.15-3.71)和对流感疫苗效力的信心(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 44%,而对照组中有 28%;优势比:2.62,95%置信区间:1.46-4.69)。在婴儿出生后 1 年时,MomsTalkShots 增加了对疫苗知识的感知(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 62%,而对照组中有 50%;优势比:1.74,95%置信区间:1.36-2.24)和对妇产科医生提供的疫苗信息的信任(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 64%,而对照组中有 55%;优势比:1.53,95%置信区间:1.17-2.00)。在基线时对接种疫苗不确定的参与者中,MomsTalkShots 增加了对疫苗知识的感知(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 47%,而对照组中有 12%;优势比:6.89,95%置信区间:1.52-31.25)和减少了对婴儿疫苗安全性的担忧(接受 MomsTalkShots 的参与者中有 71%,而对照组中有 91%;优势比:0.24,95%置信区间:0.06-0.98)。

结论

MomsTalkShots 提高了孕妇和母亲对母婴疫苗及其预防疾病的知识和认识,并提供了一种可扩展的工具来解决疫苗犹豫问题。

试验注册

于 2016 年 9 月 13 日在 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册(注册号:NCT02898688)。

相似文献

1
MomsTalkShots, tailored educational app, improves vaccine attitudes: a randomized controlled trial.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):2134. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14498-7.
2
MomsTalkShots: An individually tailored educational application for maternal and infant vaccines.
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 8;37(43):6478-6485. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.080. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
3
Factors associated with referring close contacts to an app with individually-tailored vaccine information.
Vaccine. 2020 Mar 17;38(13):2827-2832. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Characterizing the vaccine knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and intentions of pregnant women in Georgia and Colorado.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1109-1117. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1717130. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Vaccine Knowledge, Attitudes, and Intentions.
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):699-709. doi: 10.1177/0033354920974660. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Immunity Awareness-Strategies to Improve the Degree of Acceptance of Vaccines: A Systematic Review.
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jun 7;13(6):618. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060618.
4
[Digital innovations in vaccination communication].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Apr;68(4):408-415. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04019-3. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
5
COVID-19 and influenza vaccine Hesitancy among adults hospitalized in the United States, 2019-2022.
Vaccine. 2025 Feb 27;48:126806. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126806. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
6
A World without Measles and Rubella: Addressing the Challenge of Vaccine Hesitancy.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;12(6):694. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12060694.
9
Influenza vaccination landscape in Italy: A comprehensive study through the OBVIOUS project lens.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug;19(2):2252250. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2252250. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
10
: personalized vaccine risk communication.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 30;11:1195751. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1195751. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-tiered intervention to increase maternal immunization coverage: A randomized, controlled trial.
Vaccine. 2022 Aug 12;40(34):4955-4963. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.055. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy.
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1629-1631. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15494.
3
Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy.
Nat Med. 2021 Oct;27(10):1693-1695. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01490-8. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Walking the Tightrope: Reevaluating science communication in the era of COVID-19 vaccines.
Vaccine. 2021 Sep 15;39(39):5453-5455. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.037. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
Strategies to increase uptake of maternal pertussis vaccination.
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 Jul;20(7):779-796. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1940146. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
Communicating With Vaccine-Hesitant Parents: A Narrative Review.
Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4S):S24-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.01.018.
9
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2273-2282. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104983. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine response in pregnant and lactating women: a cohort study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):303.e1-303.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.023. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验