Suppr超能文献

非过敏专科医生支持青霉素过敏评估和重新标记成人和儿科患者的干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and delabeling of adult and pediatric patients by nonallergy specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom TR1 3LJ / School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Intensive Care Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;129:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Penicillin allergy records are often incorrect and may result in harm. We aimed to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of nonallergist health care worker delivery of penicillin allergy delabeling.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE/MEDLINE/CINAHL (Ovid), PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to January 21, 2022 and unpublished studies and gray literature. The proportion of patients allergic to penicillin delabeled and harmed was calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Overall, 5019 patients were delabeled. Using allergy history alone, 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9-21%) of 4350 assessed patients were delabeled without reported harm. Direct drug provocation testing resulted in delabeling in 27% (95% CI, 18-37%) of 4207 assessed patients. Of the 1373 patients tested, 98% were delabeled (95% CI, 97-99%), and nonserious harm was reported in 1% (95% CI, 0-2%). Using skin testing, followed by drug provocation testing, 41% (95% CI, 24-59%) of 2890 assessed patients were delabeled. Of the 1294 tested patients, 95.0% (95% CI, 90-99%) were delabeled, and the reported harm was low (0%; (95% CI 0-1%).

CONCLUSION

Penicillin allergy delabeling by nonallergists is efficacious and safe. The proportion of assessed patients who can be delabeled increases with the complexity of testing method, but substantial numbers can be delabeled without skin testing.

摘要

目的

青霉素过敏记录常存在错误,并可能导致伤害。我们旨在系统评价非过敏专科医护人员实施青霉素过敏去标签的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们检索了 EMBASE/MEDLINE/CINAHL(Ovid)、PsycInfo、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 中心数据库(从建库至 2022 年 1 月 21 日),以及未发表的研究和灰色文献。采用随机效应模型计算去标签且无报告伤害的患者比例。

结果

共纳入 5019 例患者去标签。仅依据过敏史,在 4350 例评估患者中,14%(95%置信区间 [CI],9%-21%)去标签且无报告伤害。直接药物激发试验在 4207 例评估患者中导致 27%(95%CI,18%-37%)去标签。在 1373 例接受检测的患者中,98%(95%CI,97%-99%)被去标签,1%(95%CI,0%-2%)报告发生非严重伤害。采用皮肤试验,随后进行药物激发试验,在 2890 例评估患者中有 41%(95%CI,24%-59%)去标签。在 1294 例接受检测的患者中,95.0%(95%CI,90%-99%)被去标签,报告的伤害较低(0%;95%CI,0%-1%)。

结论

非过敏专科医护人员进行青霉素过敏去标签是有效且安全的。随着检测方法的复杂性增加,可去标签评估患者的比例增加,但无需皮肤试验也可使大量患者去标签。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e65b/10017351/1d7b82e38a2a/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验