Suppr超能文献

系统评价血小板输注:是否存在不必要的重复工作? 范围综述。

Systematic reviews on platelet transfusions: Is there unnecessary duplication of effort? A scoping review.

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.

South Danish Transfusion Service & Tissue Center, Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2023 Jan;118(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/vox.13387. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Platelet transfusions are used across multiple patient populations to prevent and correct bleeding. This scoping review aimed to map the currently available systematic reviews (SRs) and evidence-based guidelines in the field of platelet transfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in seven databases for SRs on effectiveness (including dose and timing, transfusion trigger and ratio to other blood products), production modalities and decision support related to platelet transfusion. The following data were charted: methodological features of the SR, population, concept and context features, outcomes reported, study design and number of studies included. Results were synthesized in interactive evidence maps.

RESULTS

We identified 110 SRs. The majority focused on clinical effectiveness, including prophylactic or therapeutic transfusions compared to no platelet transfusion (34 SRs), prophylactic compared to therapeutic-only transfusion (8 SRs), dose, timing (11 SRs) and threshold for platelet transfusion (15 SRs) and the ratio of platelet transfusion to other blood products in massive transfusion (14 SRs). Furthermore, we included 34 SRs on decision support, of which 26 evaluated viscoelastic testing. Finally, we identified 22 SRs on platelet production modalities, including derivation (4 SRs), pathogen inactivation (6 SRs), leucodepletion (4 SRs) and ABO/human leucocyte antigen matching (5 SRs). The SRs were mapped according to concept and clinical context.

CONCLUSION

An interactive evidence map of SRs and evidence-based guidelines in the field of platelet transfusion has been developed and identified multiple reviews. This work serves as a tool for researchers looking for evidence gaps, thereby both supporting research and avoiding unnecessary duplication.

摘要

背景与目的

血小板输注在多个患者群体中被用于预防和纠正出血。本范围性综述旨在绘制血小板输注领域中当前可用的系统评价 (SR) 和循证指南。

材料与方法

在七个数据库中进行了系统文献检索,以查找有关血小板输注的有效性(包括剂量和时间、输注触发和与其他血液制品的比例)、生产方式和决策支持的 SR。以下数据被图表化:SR 的方法学特征、人群、概念和背景特征、报告的结局、研究设计和纳入的研究数量。结果以交互式证据图进行综合。

结果

我们确定了 110 项 SR。其中大多数聚焦于临床有效性,包括与不输注血小板相比的预防性或治疗性输注(34 项 SR)、与仅治疗性输注相比的预防性输注(8 项 SR)、剂量、时间(11 项 SR)和血小板输注阈值(15 项 SR)以及大出血中血小板输注与其他血液制品的比例(14 项 SR)。此外,我们纳入了 34 项关于决策支持的 SR,其中 26 项评估了黏弹性检测。最后,我们确定了 22 项关于血小板生产方式的 SR,包括衍生(4 项 SR)、病原体灭活(6 项 SR)、白细胞去除(4 项 SR)和 ABO/人类白细胞抗原匹配(5 项 SR)。SR 根据概念和临床背景进行了映射。

结论

已开发出血小板输注领域的 SR 和循证指南的交互式证据图,并确定了多项综述。这项工作为寻找证据空白的研究人员提供了工具,从而支持研究并避免不必要的重复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b13/10107266/931619b90027/VOX-118-16-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验