Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Apr;18(4):463-475. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.022. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
Preferred first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer is osimertinib, yet it is not known whether patient outcomes may be improved by identifying and intervening on molecular markers associated with therapeutic resistance.
All patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 327) were identified. Available pretreatment and postprogression tumor samples underwent targeted gene panel sequencing and mutational signature analysis using SigMA algorithm. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Using multivariate analysis, baseline atypical EGFR (median PFS = 5.8 mo, p < 0.001) and concurrent TP53/RB1 alterations (median PFS = 10.5 mo, p = 0.015) were associated with shorter PFS on first-line osimertinib. Of 95 patients with postprogression biopsies, acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 52% (off-target, n = 24; histologic transformation, n = 14; on-target, n = 12), with MET amplification (n = 9), small cell lung transformation (n = 7), and acquired EGFR amplification (n = 7), the most frequently identified mechanisms. Although there was no difference in postprogression survival on the basis of identified resistance (p = 0.07), patients with subsequent second-line therapy tailored to postprogression biopsy results had improved postprogression survival (hazard ratio = 0.09, p = 0.006). The paired postprogression tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p = 0.008) and further dominant APOBEC mutational signatures (p = 0.07) compared with the pretreatment samples.
Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib have improved survival with treatment adaptation on the basis of identified mechanisms of resistance at time of progression using tissue-based genomic analysis. Further survival gains may be achieved using risk-based treatment adaptation of pretreatment genomic alterations.
对于转移性 EGFR 突变型肺癌患者,首选的一线治疗方法是奥希替尼,但尚不清楚通过鉴定和干预与治疗耐药相关的分子标志物是否可以改善患者的预后。
在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center),所有接受一线奥希替尼治疗的转移性 EGFR 突变型肺癌患者(n=327)均被确定。对所有患者的基线和进展期肿瘤标本进行了靶向基因panel 测序和 SigMA 算法的突变特征分析。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期。
多变量分析显示,基线时非典型 EGFR(中位 PFS=5.8 个月,p<0.001)和同时存在的 TP53/RB1 改变(中位 PFS=10.5 个月,p=0.015)与一线奥希替尼治疗的较短 PFS 相关。在 95 例进展期有活检的患者中,52%(靶外,n=24;组织学转化,n=14;靶内,n=12)患者发生了获得性耐药机制,最常见的机制包括 MET 扩增(n=9)、小细胞肺癌转化(n=7)和获得性 EGFR 扩增(n=7)。虽然基于鉴定的耐药机制,进展后生存没有差异(p=0.07),但根据进展后活检结果进行二线治疗的患者,进展后生存得到改善(风险比=0.09,p=0.006)。与基线样本相比,配对的进展期肿瘤具有更高的肿瘤突变负担(p=0.008)和进一步的主导 APOBEC 突变特征(p=0.07)。
在进展时通过基于组织的基因组分析,根据耐药机制鉴定结果进行治疗调整,接受一线奥希替尼治疗的 EGFR 突变型肺癌患者的生存得到改善。通过基于风险的治疗调整预处理基因组改变,可能会进一步获得生存获益。