Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02568-6.
National quality registries (NQRs) provide open data for user-directed acquisition. National Quality Registry (NQR) data are often used to analyze the rates of treatment success and adverse events for studies that aim to improve treatment quality and patient satisfaction. Thus, NQRs promote the goal of achieving evidence-based therapies. However, the scientific literature seldom focuses on the complex process of initiating, designing, and implementing an NQR. Starting an NQR may be particularly challenging in a setting where specialized care is decentralized, such as orthognathic surgery in Sweden. The present study describes the initiation and early phases of a new NQR for orthognathic surgery in Sweden.
The initial inventory phase included gaining knowledge on regulations, creating economic plans, and identifying pitfalls in existing NQRs. Next, a crude framework for the registry was achieved. Outcome measures were selected with a nation-wide questionnaire, followed by a Delphi-like process for selecting parameters to include in the NQR. Our inclusive process comprised a stepwise introduction, feedback-based modifications, and preparatory educational efforts. Descriptive data were collected, based on the first 2 years (2018-2019) of registry operation.
Two years after implementation, 862 patients that underwent 1320 procedures were registered. This number corresponded to a 91% coverage rate. Bimaxillary treatments predominated, and the most common were a Le Fort I osteotomy combined with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (n = 275). Reoperations were conducted in 32 patients (3.6%), and the rate of patient satisfaction was 95%.
A National Quality Registry should preferentially be started and maintained by an appointed task force of active clinicians. A collaborative, transparent, inclusive process may be an important factor for achieving credibility and high coverage, particularly in a decentralized setting.
国家质量登记处(NQR)提供用户导向的数据采集。国家质量登记处(NQR)的数据通常用于分析治疗成功率和不良事件的比率,以改善治疗质量和患者满意度。因此,NQR 促进了实现循证治疗的目标。然而,科学文献很少关注启动、设计和实施 NQR 的复杂过程。在像瑞典的正颌外科那样的专业护理分散的环境中,启动 NQR 可能特别具有挑战性。本研究描述了在瑞典开展新的正颌外科 NQR 的启动和早期阶段。
初始库存阶段包括了解法规、制定经济计划以及识别现有 NQR 中的陷阱。接下来,实现了注册表的粗略框架。通过全国性问卷选择了结果测量指标,然后进行了类似于 Delphi 的过程来选择要包含在 NQR 中的参数。我们的包容性过程包括逐步引入、基于反馈的修改以及预备性教育工作。根据注册表运行的头 2 年(2018-2019 年)收集描述性数据。
实施两年后,有 862 名患者接受了 1320 例手术,注册了 1320 例手术。这个数字对应于 91%的覆盖率。双颌治疗占主导地位,最常见的是 Le Fort I 截骨术与双侧矢状劈开截骨术联合(n=275)。32 名患者进行了再次手术(3.6%),患者满意度为 95%。
国家质量登记处最好由指定的积极临床医生工作队启动和维护。协作、透明、包容的过程可能是获得可信度和高覆盖率的重要因素,特别是在分散的环境中。