Soil Physics and Land Management Group (SLM), Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands; Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra, Bencanta, 3045-601, Coimbra, Portugal.
Soil Physics and Land Management Group (SLM), Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Environ Res. 2023 Feb 1;218:114961. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114961. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
Due to their seemingly ubiquitous nature and links to environmental and human health problems, microplastics are quickly becoming a major concern worldwide. Artificial environments, such as those found in urban environments, represent some of the main sources of microplastic. However, very few studies have focused on the occurrence of microplastics in urban soils. The aim of the current research was to evaluate the microplastic contamination in urban soils from artificial and natural land uses throughout Coimbra city, Portugal. Sixty-seven spaces and ten land use areas were evaluated. The artificial land use areas were dumps, landfills, parking lots, industries and construction areas, and the natural land use areas were forests, urban parks, moors (wetlands), pastures and urban agricultural areas. Microplastic extraction was done by density separation. Quantification and size measurements of microplastics was carried out using a microscope. Polymer types were identified by μ-FTIR for 25% of the samples. The microplastic content ranged from 5 × 10 to 571 × 10 particles·kg, with a mean of 106 × 10 particle·kg. The green park was the land use with the highest concentration of microplastics (158 × 10 particle·kg) and the forest was the one with the lowest concentration (55 × 10 particle·kg). The landfill (150 × 10 particle·kg), industry (127 × 10 particle·kg) and dump (126 × 10 particle·kg) were the artificial spaces with the highest levels of microplastics. The main polymers detected were polypropylene and polyethylene, followed by polyvinyl chloride and rubber, and the main sizes measured between 50 and 250 μm. Our results indicate that natural spaces can contain higher amounts of microplastics as compared to artificial spaces in the urban environment. This suggests that microplastics are easily transported through the urban landscape and that urban green spaces can retain microplastics in their soils. Land use planning may present an opportunity to better control the levels of microplastics in urban environments.
由于微塑料无处不在,且与环境和人类健康问题有关,因此它们迅速成为全球关注的焦点。人工环境,如城市环境,是微塑料的主要来源之一。然而,很少有研究关注城市土壤中微塑料的存在。本研究旨在评估葡萄牙科英布拉市人工和自然土地利用的城市土壤中的微塑料污染。评估了 67 个地点和 10 个土地利用区。人工土地利用区包括垃圾场、垃圾填埋场、停车场、工业和建筑工地,自然土地利用区包括森林、城市公园、荒野(湿地)、牧场和城市农业区。通过密度分离法提取微塑料。使用显微镜对微塑料的数量和尺寸进行测量。对 25%的样本进行 μ-FTIR 鉴定聚合物类型。微塑料含量范围为 5×10 至 571×10 颗粒·kg,平均值为 106×10 颗粒·kg。绿色公园是微塑料浓度最高的土地利用类型(158×10 颗粒·kg),森林是微塑料浓度最低的土地利用类型(55×10 颗粒·kg)。垃圾填埋场(150×10 颗粒·kg)、工业(127×10 颗粒·kg)和垃圾场(126×10 颗粒·kg)是人工空间中微塑料含量最高的地方。检测到的主要聚合物是聚丙烯和聚乙烯,其次是聚氯乙烯和橡胶,主要尺寸在 50 至 250 μm 之间。我们的研究结果表明,与城市环境中的人工空间相比,自然空间可能含有更多的微塑料。这表明微塑料很容易通过城市景观运输,城市绿地可以在土壤中保留微塑料。土地利用规划可能是更好地控制城市环境中微塑料水平的机会。