Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Department of Digestive Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, Satasairaala Central Hospital, Pori, Finland.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 May;19(5):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.036. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
LSG and LRYGB are globally the most common bariatric procedures. IMS score categorizes T2D severity (mild, moderate, and severe) based on 4 independent preoperative predictors of long-term remission as follows: T2D duration, number of diabetes medications, insulin use, and glycemic control. IMS score has not been validated in a randomized patient cohort.
To assess the feasibility of individualized metabolic surgery (IMS) score in facilitating procedure selection between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for patients with severe obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Merged individual patient-level 5-year data of 2 large randomized clinical trials (SLEEVEPASS and SM-BOSS [Swiss Multicenter Bypass or Sleeve Study]).
IMS score was calculated for study patients and its performance was analyzed.
One hundred thirty-nine out of 155 patients with T2D had available preoperative data to calculate IMS score as follows: mild stage (n = 41/139), moderate stage (n = 77/139), severe stage (n = 21/139). At 5 years, 135 (87.1%, 67 LSG/68 LRYGB) were available for follow-up and 121 patients had both pre- and postoperative data. Diabetes remission rates according to preoperative IMS score were as follows: mild stage 87.5% (n = 14/16) after LSG and 85.7% (n = 18/21) after LRYGB (P = .999), moderate stage 42.9% (n = 15/35) and 45.2% (n = 14/31) (P = .999), and severe stage 18.2% (n = 2/11) and 0% (n = 0/7) (P = .497), respectively. The T2D remission rate varied significantly between the stages as follows: mild versus moderate odds ratio (OR) 8.3 (95% CI, 2.8-24.0; P < .001), mild versus severe OR 52.2 (95% CI 9.0-302.3; P < .001), and moderate versus severe OR 6.3 (95% CI, 1.3-29.8; P = .020).
In our study, remission rates of T2D were not statistically different after LSG and LRYGB among all patients and among patients with mild, moderate, and severe diabetes stratified by the IMS score. However, the study may be underpowered to detect differences due to small number of patients in each subgroup. IMS score seemed to be useful in predicting long-term T2D remission after bariatric surgery.
LSG 和 LRYGB 是全球最常见的减肥手术。IMS 评分根据长期缓解的 4 个独立术前预测因素(T2D 持续时间、糖尿病药物数量、胰岛素使用和血糖控制)对 T2D 严重程度(轻度、中度和重度)进行分类。IMS 评分尚未在随机患者队列中得到验证。
评估个体化代谢手术(IMS)评分在促进严重肥胖和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中选择腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)之间的可行性。
合并两项大型随机临床试验(SLEEVEPASS 和 SM-BOSS[瑞士多中心旁路或袖套研究])的个体患者 5 年汇总数据。
为研究患者计算 IMS 评分并分析其性能。
139 例 T2D 患者中有 139 例(139/155)有术前数据可计算 IMS 评分,如下所示:轻度(n=41/139)、中度(n=77/139)、重度(n=21/139)。5 年后,135 例(87.1%,67 例 LSG/68 例 LRYGB)可进行随访,121 例患者既有术前数据又有术后数据。根据术前 IMS 评分,糖尿病缓解率如下:LSG 后轻度阶段为 87.5%(n=14/16),LRYGB 后为 85.7%(n=18/21)(P=0.999);中重度阶段为 42.9%(n=15/35)和 45.2%(n=14/31)(P=0.999);严重阶段为 18.2%(n=2/11)和 0%(n=0/7)(P=0.497)。T2D 缓解率在各阶段差异显著,如下:轻度与中度的比值比(OR)为 8.3(95%CI,2.8-24.0;P<.001),轻度与重度的 OR 为 52.2(95%CI,9.0-302.3;P<.001),中度与重度的 OR 为 6.3(95%CI,1.3-29.8;P=0.020)。
在我们的研究中,所有患者和 IMS 评分分层的轻度、中度和重度糖尿病患者中,LSG 和 LRYGB 后 T2D 的缓解率在统计学上无差异。然而,由于每个亚组的患者数量较少,该研究可能检测不到差异。IMS 评分似乎可用于预测减肥手术后 T2D 的长期缓解。