Suppr超能文献

开放对话中的同伴支持与共同决策:机遇与建议。

Peer support and shared decision making in Open Dialogue: Opportunities and recommendations.

作者信息

Chmielowska Marta, Mannocci Nell, Tansel Alexander, Zisman-Ilani Yaara

机构信息

Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

North East London NHS Foundation Trust Research and Development Department, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 8;13:1059412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059412. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Open dialogue (OD) is a person-centred social network model of crisis and continuing mental healthcare, which promotes agency and long-term recovery in mental illness. Peer support workers who have lived experience of mental illness play a key role in OD in the UK, as they enhance shared understanding of mental health crisis as part of the OD model and provide a sense of belonging and social inclusion. These elements are in alignment with the shared decision making (SDM) approach in mental health, which focuses on person-centred communication in treatment decision-making. The previously documented benefits of peer-led SDM include increased engagement with services, symptom reduction, increased employment opportunities, and reduced utilization of mental and general health services. While the contribution of peer support and SDM principles to OD has been acknowledged, there is only a small body of literature surrounding this development, and little guidance on how peer support can enhance treatment decision-making and other aspects of OD. This viewpoint, which was co-authored by people with lived experience of mental illness, clinicians, and researchers, discusses practical implications and recommendations for research and training for the provision of a co-produced OD model grounded in peer support and SDM.

摘要

开放对话(OD)是一种以个人为中心的危机及持续精神卫生保健的社会网络模式,它促进精神疾病患者的自主性及长期康复。有精神疾病亲身经历的同伴支持工作者在英国的开放对话模式中发挥着关键作用,因为他们增进了对作为开放对话模式一部分的心理健康危机的共同理解,并提供了归属感和社会包容感。这些要素与精神卫生领域的共同决策(SDM)方法相一致,该方法侧重于治疗决策过程中以个人为中心的沟通。先前记录的同伴主导的共同决策的益处包括增加对服务的参与度、减轻症状、增加就业机会以及减少精神卫生和一般医疗服务的使用。虽然同伴支持和共同决策原则对开放对话的贡献已得到认可,但围绕这一发展的文献数量很少,关于同伴支持如何增强治疗决策及开放对话其他方面的指导也很少。这一由有精神疾病亲身经历的人、临床医生和研究人员共同撰写的观点,讨论了基于同伴支持和共同决策提供共同制定的开放对话模式的研究及培训的实际意义和建议。

相似文献

1
Peer support and shared decision making in Open Dialogue: Opportunities and recommendations.
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 8;13:1059412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059412. eCollection 2022.
3
Introducing Peer-supported Open Dialogue in changing mental health care.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1056071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056071. eCollection 2022.
4
Shared decision making interventions in mental healthcare: a protocol for an umbrella review.
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 15;11(9):e051283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051283.
5
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Conceptual understanding and applicability of shared decision-making in psychiatric care: An integrative review.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):531-548. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12712. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
7
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
10
Peer researchers' experiences of a co-produced research project on supported decision-making.
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00406-1.

引用本文的文献

2
[Overlooked professionalism-Individual factors for success of peer support workers].
Nervenarzt. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01754-x.
3
Conceptualizing the peer contribution in Open Dialogue practice.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1176839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176839. eCollection 2023.
4
Open Dialogue in Spain: an initial survey of knowledge and perspectives.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1166919. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166919. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Decision Making and Peer Support: New Directions for Research and Practice.
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Apr 1;74(4):427-428. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220407. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Using Crisis Theory in Dealing With Severe Mental Illness-A Step Toward Normalization?
Front Sociol. 2022 Jun 9;7:805604. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.805604. eCollection 2022.
3
Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach.
Front Sociol. 2021 Dec 22;6:806437. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.806437. eCollection 2021.
6
Time to Support Extensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1183-1184. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2247.
7
Personal Recovery in People With a Psychotic Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associated Factors.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;12:622628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.622628. eCollection 2021.
8
Shared Risk Taking: Shared Decision Making in Serious Mental Illness.
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Apr 1;72(4):461-463. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000156. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
9
Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review.
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jun 9;7(6):e15572. doi: 10.2196/15572.
10
It Does Take Two to Tango: An Applied Conversation Analysis of Interactions between a Psychiatrist and Service-Users Discussing Medication.
Health Commun. 2019 Nov;34(13):1628-1636. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1517633. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验