Samkange Alaster, Chitanga Simbarashe, Neves Luis, Matjila Tshepo
School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia, P. Bag 13301, Pionierspark, Windhoek, Namibia.
University of Pretoria, Private Bag x 20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Dec 27;55(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03441-y.
This study assessed the knowledge, attitudes and practices of livestock farmers in Namibia's Khomas region and animal health practitioners (veterinarians and animal health technicians) in the whole country concerning neosporosis and toxoplasmosis. Structured questionnaires were used, and a total of 63 farmers and 51 animal health practitioners responded out of an estimated 560 farmers in the Khomas region and 300 veterinarians and veterinary technicians in the country. Only 15.9% of the livestock farmers (n = 63) had heard about neosporosis or toxoplasmosis or knew how animals get infected (p < 0.0001). Only 5% of the farmers knew the risks associated with keeping dogs and cats concerning neosporosis and toxoplasmosis, respectively (p < 0.0001). None of the 51 animal health practitioners routinely requested Neospora caninum or Toxoplasma gondii laboratory tests in cases of cattle, sheep or goat abortions. Although all animal health practitioners indicated they routinely interacted with livestock farmers, none regularly discussed neosporosis or toxoplasmosis. Only 3.9% of animal health practitioners (n = 51) indicated that they had ever discussed either neosporosis or toxoplasmosis at a farmers' gathering (p < 0.0001), and only 21.6% had talked to at least one cat owner about toxoplasmosis in the previous 12 months (p < 0.0001). The authors concluded that farmers in the Khomas region were generally unaware of neosporosis and toxoplasmosis but could change their attitudes and practices if educated. The animal health practitioners lacked a deeper understanding and appreciation of the two diseases, which is required to cultivate enough confidence to educate farmers. Sharing this research and other relevant information on the two diseases at farmers' meetings, veterinary congresses, journals and newsletters could help educate farmers and animal health practitioners. Such platforms are likely to succeed because both these groups use these forums to get new information.
本研究评估了纳米比亚霍马斯地区的牲畜养殖户以及全国的动物卫生从业者(兽医和动物卫生技术员)对新孢子虫病和弓形虫病的知识、态度及做法。研究采用了结构化问卷,在霍马斯地区估计的560名养殖户以及全国300名兽医和兽医技术员中,分别有63名养殖户和51名动物卫生从业者做出了回应。在牲畜养殖户(n = 63)中,只有15.9%听说过新孢子虫病或弓形虫病,或者知道动物是如何感染的(p < 0.0001)。只有5%的养殖户分别了解养猫和养狗与新孢子虫病和弓形虫病相关的风险(p < 0.0001)。在51名动物卫生从业者中,没有一人在牛、羊或山羊流产病例中常规要求进行犬新孢子虫或刚地弓形虫的实验室检测。尽管所有动物卫生从业者都表示他们经常与牲畜养殖户互动,但没有人定期讨论新孢子虫病或弓形虫病。只有3.9%的动物卫生从业者(n = 51)表示他们曾在养殖户聚会上讨论过新孢子虫病或弓形虫病(p < 0.0001),并且在过去12个月里只有21.6%的人至少与一名猫主人谈论过弓形虫病(p < 0.0001)。作者得出结论,霍马斯地区的养殖户普遍不了解新孢子虫病和弓形虫病,但如果接受教育,他们的态度和做法可能会改变。动物卫生从业者对这两种疾病缺乏更深入的理解和认识,而这是培养足够信心去教育养殖户所必需的。在养殖户会议、兽医大会、期刊和通讯上分享关于这两种疾病的这项研究及其他相关信息,可能有助于教育养殖户和动物卫生从业者。这样的平台可能会成功,因为这两个群体都利用这些论坛获取新信息。