McClintock Catherine R, Mulholland Niamh, Krasnodembskaya Anna D
Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 14;9:1011819. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1011819. eCollection 2022.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the main causes of Intensive Care Unit morbidity and mortality. Metabolic biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction are correlated with disease development and high mortality in many respiratory conditions, however it is not known if they can be used to assess risk of mortality in patients with ARDS.
The aim of this systematic review was to examine the link between recorded biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction in ARDS and mortality.
A systematic review of CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases was performed. Studies had to include critically ill ARDS patients with reported biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction and mortality. Information on the levels of biomarkers reflective of energy metabolism and mitochondrial respiratory function, mitochondrial metabolites, coenzymes, and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) copy number was recorded. RevMan5.4 was used for meta-analysis. Biomarkers measured in the samples representative of systemic circulation were analyzed separately from the biomarkers measured in the samples representative of lung compartment. Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to evaluate publication bias (Prospero protocol: CRD42022288262).
Twenty-five studies were included in the systematic review and nine had raw data available for follow up meta-analysis. Biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction included mtDNA, glutathione coupled mediators, lactate, malondialdehyde, mitochondrial genetic defects, oxidative stress associated markers. Biomarkers that were eligible for meta-analysis inclusion were: xanthine, hypoxanthine, acetone, -pentane, isoprene and mtDNA. Levels of mitochondrial biomarkers were significantly higher in ARDS than in non-ARDS controls ( = 0.0008) in the blood-based samples, whereas in the BAL the difference did not reach statistical significance ( = 0.14). mtDNA was the most frequently measured biomarker, its levels in the blood-based samples were significantly higher in ARDS compared to non-ARDS controls ( = 0.04). Difference between mtDNA levels in ARDS non-survivors compared to ARDS survivors did not reach statistical significance ( = 0.05).
Increased levels of biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction in the blood-based samples are positively associated with ARDS. Circulating mtDNA is the most frequently measured biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction, with significantly elevated levels in ARDS patients compared to non-ARDS controls. Its potential to predict risk of ARDS mortality requires further investigation.
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42022288262].
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是重症监护病房发病和死亡的主要原因之一。线粒体功能障碍的代谢生物标志物与许多呼吸系统疾病的疾病发展和高死亡率相关,然而尚不清楚它们是否可用于评估ARDS患者的死亡风险。
本系统评价的目的是研究ARDS中线粒体功能障碍的记录生物标志物与死亡率之间的联系。
对CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库进行了系统评价。研究必须纳入报告了线粒体功能障碍生物标志物和死亡率的重症ARDS患者。记录了反映能量代谢和线粒体呼吸功能、线粒体代谢物、辅酶和线粒体脱氧核糖核酸(mtDNA)拷贝数的生物标志物水平。使用RevMan5.4进行荟萃分析。在代表体循环的样本中测量的生物标志物与在代表肺腔的样本中测量的生物标志物分开分析。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表来评估发表偏倚(国际前瞻性系统评价注册平台协议号:CRD42022288262)。
系统评价纳入了25项研究,其中9项有原始数据可用于后续荟萃分析。线粒体功能障碍的生物标志物包括mtDNA、谷胱甘肽偶联介质、乳酸、丙二醛、线粒体遗传缺陷、氧化应激相关标志物。符合荟萃分析纳入标准的生物标志物有:黄嘌呤、次黄嘌呤、丙酮、戊烷、异戊二烯和mtDNA。在基于血液的样本中,ARDS患者的线粒体生物标志物水平显著高于非ARDS对照组(P = 0.0008),而在支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本中,差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.14)。mtDNA是测量最频繁的生物标志物,与非ARDS对照组相比,其在基于血液的样本中的水平在ARDS患者中显著更高(P = 0.04)。ARDS非幸存者与ARDS幸存者的mtDNA水平差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.05)。
基于血液的样本中线粒体功能障碍生物标志物水平升高与ARDS呈正相关。循环mtDNA是最常测量的线粒体功能障碍生物标志物,与非ARDS对照组相比,ARDS患者的水平显著升高。其预测ARDS死亡风险的潜力需要进一步研究。