Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine II (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectiology), University Hospital Freiburg, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Public Health Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Livingstonia, Mzuzu, Malawi.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):e062009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062009.
A cross-sectional and a policy document review study was performed to investigate perceived acceptability and feasibility to implementing different integration measures for tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) healthcare among healthcare workers (HCWs) and health managers, and to describe policy influence through a policy documents review in Malawi.
The survey was performed at eight hospitals, ministry of health offices and 10 non-governmental organisations. We collected data in March and April 2021.
Of 95 HCWs and health managers invited; 92 participated. 21/92 (23%) were female, and 17/92 (18%) participants were from clinics that piloted the integrated care for TB and DM.
We described awareness levels on TB/DM comorbidity, perceptions and experiences in TB/DM care. Furthermore, development processes and contents of included documents were analysed.
16/17 (94%) of HCWs from clinics piloting integrated care and 65/75 (86%) HCWs from hospitals that do not use integrated care for TB and DM responded that integrated care was acceptable and feasible. In qualitative data, shortage of resources, inadequate information sharing were common themes. We included seven relevant documents for the analysis. On development process and content, six of seven documents were scored ≥70%. In these documents, DM is a recognised risk factor for TB, and integration of healthcare services for infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases is recommended, however, these documents lacked information specifically on integrated care for TB and DM.
In this study, we identified inadequate information sharing, and lack of resources as major factors impeding implementation of integration of services, however, awareness on TB/DM comorbidity was high.
本研究采用横断面调查和政策文件回顾的方法,调查医护人员和卫生管理人员对实施结核病(TB)和糖尿病(DM)综合医疗不同整合措施的可接受性和可行性,并通过政策文件回顾描述在马拉维的政策影响。
该调查在 8 家医院、卫生部办公室和 10 家非政府组织进行。我们于 2021 年 3 月和 4 月收集数据。
在 95 名受邀的医护人员和卫生管理人员中,有 92 人参与了调查。92 名参与者中,21 名(23%)为女性,17 名(18%)来自试点结核病和糖尿病综合护理的诊所。
17 名来自试点综合护理诊所的医护人员(94%)和 75 名来自不使用结核病和糖尿病综合护理的医院的医护人员(86%)表示,综合护理是可接受和可行的。在定性数据中,资源短缺、信息共享不足是常见主题。我们分析了纳入的 7 份相关文件的开发过程和内容。在发展过程和内容方面,7 份文件中有 6 份得分≥70%。在这些文件中,DM 是结核病的一个公认的危险因素,并且建议整合传染病和非传染性疾病的医疗服务,但这些文件缺乏关于结核病和糖尿病综合护理的具体信息。
在这项研究中,我们发现信息共享不足和资源匮乏是阻碍服务整合实施的主要因素,但对结核病和糖尿病合并症的认识较高。