Department of Statistic, Institute for Public Health FB&H, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Department of Epidemiology, Institute for Public Health FB&H, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 31;59(1):97. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010097.
: Patient satisfaction with health care can influence health care-seeking behavior in relation to both minor or major health problems or influence communication and compliance with medical advice, which is especially important in emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, it is important to continually monitor patient satisfaction with provided care and their dynamics. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with health care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult population of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FB&H) and compare it with levels of satisfaction in the same population before the COVID-19 pandemic. : A representative, population-based survey was implemented in the adult population of the FB&H using the EUROPEP instrument, which measures satisfaction with health care using 23 items. The sample included 740 respondents who were 18 years or older residing in the FB&H and was implemented in December 2020. All data were collected using a system of online panels. The survey questions targeted the nine months from the beginning of the pandemic to the time of data collection, i.e., the period of March to December 2020. : The mean composite satisfaction score across all 23 items of the EUROPEP tool was 3.2 points in all age groups; the ceiling effect was 22% for the youngest respondents (18-34 years old), 23% for 35-54 years old, and 26% for the oldest group (55+), showing increasing satisfaction by age. The overall composite score for both females and males was 3.2. The ceiling effect was higher in those with chronic disease (29% vs. 23% in those without chronic disease). The composite mean score for respondents residing in rural vs. urban areas was 3.2 with a ceiling effect of 22% in rural and 24% in urban residents. When comparing mean composite scores surveyed at various points in time in the FB&H, it was found that the score increased from 3.3 to 3.5 between 2011 and 2017 and dropped again to 3.3 in this study. Despite these observations in the overall trends of satisfaction scores, we note that no statistically significant differences were observed between most of the single-item scores in the stratified analysis, pointing to the relative uniformity of satisfaction among the analyzed population subgroups. The rate of satisfaction with health care services in the FB&H was lower during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2011 and 2017. Furthermore, while an increasing trend in satisfaction with health care was observed in the FB&H during the years prior to 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the reversal of this trend. It is important to further monitor the dynamics of patient satisfaction with health care, which could serve as a basis for planning, delivering, and maintaining quality services during the COVID-19 pandemic and other emergencies.
: 患者对医疗保健的满意度可能会影响他们对轻微或重大健康问题的医疗保健寻求行为,或影响与医疗建议的沟通和遵从性,这在 COVID-19 大流行等紧急情况下尤为重要。因此,持续监测患者对所提供护理的满意度及其动态变化非常重要。本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行期间波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那联邦(FB&H)成年人群对医疗保健的满意度,并将其与 COVID-19 大流行之前同一人群的满意度水平进行比较。: 使用 EUROPEP 工具在 FB&H 的成年人群中进行了一项具有代表性的基于人群的调查,该工具使用 23 个项目衡量对医疗保健的满意度。该样本包括 740 名年龄在 18 岁或以上、居住在 FB&H 的受访者,并于 2020 年 12 月实施。所有数据均通过在线小组系统收集。调查问题针对大流行开始到数据收集时间的九个月,即 2020 年 3 月至 12 月。: 在 EUROPEP 工具的所有 23 个项目中,所有年龄组的综合满意度平均得分为 3.2 分;最年轻的受访者(18-34 岁)的上限效应为 22%,35-54 岁为 23%,最年长组(55+)为 26%,表明随着年龄的增长满意度不断提高。女性和男性的总体综合评分均为 3.2。患有慢性病的受访者的上限效应更高(29%,而无慢性病的受访者为 23%)。居住在农村地区与城市地区的受访者的综合平均得分为 3.2,农村地区的上限效应为 22%,城市居民为 24%。在比较 FB&H 不同时间点的平均综合评分时,发现从 2011 年到 2017 年,评分从 3.3 增加到 3.5,而在本研究中又再次下降到 3.3。尽管我们注意到满意度评分总体趋势存在这些观察结果,但我们注意到分层分析中大多数单项评分之间没有观察到统计学上的显著差异,这表明分析人群亚组的满意度相对一致。: 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,FB&H 的医疗保健服务满意度低于 2011 年和 2017 年。此外,虽然在 2020 年之前,FB&H 对医疗保健的满意度呈上升趋势,但 COVID-19 大流行可能导致了这种趋势的逆转。有必要进一步监测患者对医疗保健的满意度动态,这可以为 COVID-19 大流行和其他紧急情况下的规划、提供和维持优质服务提供依据。