Zoonotic Disease Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya; International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya; Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore; Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, UK.
Lancet. 2023 Feb 18;401(10376):605-616. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01596-3. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
There has been a renewed focus on threats to the human-animal-environment interface as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and investments in One Health collaborations are expected to increase. Efforts to monitor the development of One Health Networks (OHNs) are essential to avoid duplication or misalignment of investments. This Series paper shows the global distribution of existing OHNs and assesses their collective characteristics to identify potential deficits in the ways OHNs have formed and to help increase the effectiveness of investments. We searched PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and relevant conference websites for potential OHNs and identified 184 worldwide for further analysis. We developed four case studies to show important findings from our research and exemplify best practices in One Health operationalisation. Our findings show that, although more OHNs were formed in the past 10 years than in the preceding decade, investment in OHNs has not been equitably distributed; more OHNs are formed and headquartered in Europe than in any other region, and emerging infections and novel pathogens were the priority focus area for most OHNs, with fewer OHNs focusing on other important hazards and pressing threats to health security. We found substantial deficits in the OHNs collaboration model regarding the diversity of stakeholder and sector representation, which we argue impedes effective and equitable OHN formation and contributes to other imbalances in OHN distribution and priorities. These findings are supported by previous evidence that shows the skewed investment in One Health thus far. The increased attention to One Health after the COVID-19 pandemic is an opportunity to focus efforts and resources to areas that need them most. Analyses, such as this Series paper, should be used to establish databases and repositories of OHNs worldwide. Increased attention should then be given to understanding existing resource allocation and distribution patterns, establish more egalitarian networks that encompass the breadth of One Health issues, and serve communities most affected by emerging, re-emerging, or endemic threats at the human-animal-environment interface.
由于 COVID-19 大流行,人们重新关注人类-动物-环境界面面临的威胁,预计对 合作的投资将会增加。监测 网络的发展对于避免投资的重复或错位至关重要。本系列论文展示了现有的 网络在全球的分布,并评估了它们的集体特征,以发现 网络形成方式中的潜在缺陷,并帮助提高投资的有效性。我们在 PubMed、Google、Google Scholar 和相关会议网站上搜索了潜在的 网络,并确定了 184 个进行进一步分析。我们开发了四个案例研究,以展示我们研究中的重要发现,并举例说明 运作的最佳实践。我们的研究结果表明,尽管过去 10 年形成的 网络比前一个十年多,但对 网络的投资并未公平分配;形成和总部位于欧洲的 网络比其他任何地区都多,大多数 网络的重点关注领域是新发感染和新型病原体,而关注其他重要健康安全危害和紧迫威胁的 网络较少。我们发现 网络合作模式在利益相关者和部门代表性的多样性方面存在严重缺陷,我们认为这阻碍了有效和公平的 网络形成,并导致 网络分布和优先事项的其他不平衡。这些发现得到了以往证据的支持,这些证据表明迄今为止对 的投资存在偏差。COVID-19 大流行后对 的关注度增加,是将努力和资源集中到最需要的领域的机会。应利用此类分析,如本系列论文,建立全球 网络数据库和存储库。然后,应更加关注了解现有资源分配和分布模式,建立更平等的网络,涵盖 的广泛问题,并为受人类-动物-环境界面新发、再发或地方病威胁影响最大的社区提供服务。