Luo Liying
Department of Sociology & Criminology Population Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University.
Am Sociol Rev. 2022 Feb;87(1):143-173. doi: 10.1177/00031224211052028. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
Intergenerational social mobility has immense implications for individuals' well-being, attitudes, and behaviors. However, previous methods may be unreliable for estimating heterogeneous mobility effects, especially in the presence of moderate- or large-scale intergenerational mobility. We propose an improved method, called the "mobility contrast model" (MCM). Using simulation evidence, we demonstrated that the MCM is more flexible and reliable for estimating and testing heterogeneous mobility effects, and the results are robust to the scale of intergenerational mobility. We revisited the debate about the effect of mobility on fertility and analyzed data from the 1962 Occupational Changes in a Generation Study (OCG-1) and more recent data from the 1974 through 2018 General Social Survey (GSS) using both previous models and the MCM. The MCM suggested a small association between fertility and occupational mobility in the GSS data but substantial and heterogeneous educational mobility effects on fertility in the OCG-1 and the GSS. Such effects were difficult to pinpoint using previous methods because mobility effects of different magnitudes and opposite directions among mobility groups may cancel out. The new method can be extended to investigate the effect of intergenerational mobility across multiple generations and other research areas including immigrant assimilation and heterogamy.
代际社会流动对个人的幸福感、态度和行为有着巨大的影响。然而,以前的方法在估计异质性流动效应时可能不可靠,尤其是在存在中等或大规模代际流动的情况下。我们提出了一种改进的方法,称为“流动对比模型”(MCM)。通过模拟证据,我们证明了MCM在估计和检验异质性流动效应方面更加灵活和可靠,并且结果对代际流动的规模具有稳健性。我们重新审视了关于流动对生育率影响的争论,并使用以前的模型和MCM分析了1962年一代职业变化研究(OCG - 1)的数据以及1974年至2018年综合社会调查(GSS)的最新数据。MCM表明,在GSS数据中生育率与职业流动之间存在小的关联,但在OCG - 1和GSS中教育流动对生育率有显著且异质的影响。使用以前的方法很难确定这种影响,因为流动群体中不同大小和相反方向的流动效应可能会相互抵消。这种新方法可以扩展到研究多代间的代际流动效应以及其他研究领域,包括移民同化和异族通婚。