Evitts Paul M, Allebeck Maria, Åberg Olivia Esmerelda
Communication Sciences and Disorders Program, The Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania.
Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Voice. 2025 May;39(3):843.e9-843.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.12.022. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
Since the beginning of 2020, teachers all over the world have had to switch over to virtual teaching because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This change of teaching mode has unknown consequences on the vocal health of teachers who already experience voice disorders at a rate nearly double that of the general population. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate teachers' self-reported voice problems during virtual teaching compared to face-to-face teaching and how they are associated to perceived risk factors in the work environment.
Participants included 141 teachers (49 males, 92 females) in high schools and higher education in Sweden who responded to an internet-based survey. Information was collected about participants' self-reported voice handicap using a translated version of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Information about self-reported VTD (Vocal Tract Discomfort) symptoms and dysphonia was collected in regard to both modes of teaching (virtual vs face-to- face). The survey also included questions on risk factors related to vocal health.
Self-reported voice handicap and VTD symptoms were slightly lower during periods of virtual teaching compared to periods of face-to-face teaching. There was a lower frequency of dysphonia symptoms during virtual teaching compared to face-to- face teaching, however the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, 34% of teachers reported experiencing more voice problems when teaching face-to-face while 15% reported more voice problems when teaching virtually. The most reported VTD symptoms during both virtual and face-to-face teaching were having a dry and a tight throat. The dysphonia symptoms with the highest reported frequency were a tense voice and hoarseness in both modes of teaching. Risk factors associated with higher prevalence of voice symptoms and/or higher levels of voice handicap during virtual teaching were air quality and straining the voice while teaching face-to-face. In addition, those teachers who reported more voice problems while teaching virtually also reported feeling more stressed.
The results showed a slight decrease in voice symptoms and voice handicap during virtual teaching compared to face-to-face teaching. Although multifactorial, results suggest that a potential positive effect may be attributed to better air quality in the work environment and more favorable acoustic conditions preventing teachers from straining their voice.
自2020年初以来,由于新冠疫情,世界各地的教师不得不转向虚拟教学。这种教学模式的转变对那些已经以几乎是普通人群两倍的比率患有嗓音障碍的教师的嗓音健康有着未知的影响。因此,本研究的目的是调查与面对面教学相比,教师在虚拟教学期间自我报告的嗓音问题,以及这些问题与工作环境中感知到的风险因素之间的关联。
参与者包括瑞典高中和高等教育机构的141名教师(49名男性,92名女性),他们对一项基于互联网的调查做出了回应。使用《嗓音障碍指数-10》(VHI-10)的翻译版本收集了有关参与者自我报告的嗓音障碍的信息。收集了关于两种教学模式(虚拟教学与面对面教学)下自我报告的声道不适(VTD)症状和发声困难的信息。该调查还包括有关与嗓音健康相关的风险因素的问题。
与面对面教学期间相比,虚拟教学期间自我报告的嗓音障碍和VTD症状略低。与面对面教学相比,虚拟教学期间发声困难症状的频率较低,然而差异无统计学意义。此外,34%的教师报告在面对面教学时嗓音问题更多,而15%的教师报告在虚拟教学时嗓音问题更多。在虚拟教学和面对面教学期间,报告最多的VTD症状是喉咙干燥和紧绷。两种教学模式下报告频率最高的发声困难症状是声音紧张和嘶哑。与虚拟教学期间嗓音症状患病率较高和/或嗓音障碍程度较高相关的风险因素是空气质量以及在面对面教学时过度用嗓。此外,那些报告在虚拟教学时嗓音问题更多的教师也报告感觉压力更大。
结果表明,与面对面教学相比,虚拟教学期间嗓音症状和嗓音障碍略有减少。尽管是多因素的,但结果表明潜在的积极影响可能归因于工作环境中更好的空气质量和更有利的声学条件,从而防止教师过度用嗓。