Scendoni Roberto, Fedeli Piergiorgio, Cingolani Mariano
Department of Law, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Macerata, 62100 Macerata, Italy.
School of Law, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 22;11(3):328. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030328.
To date, extensive research has been conducted on vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy to verify the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, despite the fact that pregnant women were excluded from the initial clinical trials. The ever-increasing number of scientific publications has confirmed the absence of biological mechanisms associating mRNA vaccines with adverse effects in pregnancy and breastfeeding, although few studies have been carried out on their effect on fertility. While the Italian legal system provides for maternity protection measures and indemnity for vaccination damages pursuant to law no. 210/1992, it is not exempt from controversy. This contribution describes the state of play on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant and lactating women, including: current recommendations for pregnant and lactating women; ethical issues related to vaccination hesitancy among pregnant women; the legislative paradox whereby sanctions may be imposed on women in certain professional categories who refuse vaccination because they are pregnant; and the possible legal consequences in the event of harm to the unborn child due to vaccination. All of this is considered in accordance with the principles of medical ethics, taking into account the national legislation.
迄今为止,尽管孕妇被排除在最初的临床试验之外,但针对孕期接种新冠疫苗已开展了广泛研究,以验证疫苗的安全性和有效性。尽管很少有关于mRNA疫苗对生育能力影响的研究,但越来越多的科学出版物证实,不存在将mRNA疫苗与孕期和哺乳期不良反应相关联的生物学机制。虽然意大利法律体系依据第210/1992号法律规定了产妇保护措施以及对疫苗接种损害的赔偿,但这并非毫无争议。本论文阐述了孕妇和哺乳期妇女接种新冠疫苗的现状,包括:针对孕妇和哺乳期妇女的当前建议;与孕妇疫苗犹豫相关的伦理问题;对于因怀孕而拒绝接种疫苗的某些职业类别的女性可能实施制裁的立法悖论;以及因接种疫苗导致未出生胎儿受到伤害时可能产生的法律后果。所有这些均依据医学伦理原则进行考量,并兼顾了国家立法。