Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Oct;48(10):489-494. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104332. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
This randomized trial compared pericapsular nerve group block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that, compared with pericapsular nerve group block, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration would decrease the postoperative incidence of quadriceps weakness at 3 hours fivefold (ie, from 45% to 9%).
Sixty patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive a pericapsular nerve group block (n=30) using 20 mL of adrenalized bupivacaine 0.50%, or periarticular local anesthetic infiltration (n=30) using 60 mL of adrenalized bupivacaine 0.25%. Both groups also received 30 mg of ketorolac, either intravenously (pericapsular nerve group block) or periarticularly (periarticular local anesthetic infiltration), as well as 4 mg of intravenous dexamethasone.Postoperatively, a blinded evaluator carried out sensory assessment and motor assessment (knee extension and hip adduction) at 3, 6 and 24 hours. Furthermore, the blinded observer also recorded static and dynamic pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 hours; time to first opioid request; cumulative breakthrough morphine consumption at 24 hours and 48 hours; opioid-related side effects; ability to perform physiotherapy at 6, 24 and 48 hours; as well as length of stay.
There were no differences in quadriceps weakness at 3 hours between pericapsular nerve group block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration (20% vs 33%; p=0.469). Furthermore, no intergroup differences were found in terms of sensory block or motor block at other time intervals; time to first opioid request; cumulative breakthrough morphine consumption; opioid-related side effects; ability to perform physiotherapy; and length of stay. Compared with pericapsular nerve group block, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration resulted in lower static pain scores (at all measurement intervals) and dynamic pain scores (at 3 and 6 hours).
For primary total hip arthroplasty, pericapsular nerve group block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration result in comparable rates of quadriceps weakness. However, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration is associated with lower static pain scores (especially during the first 24 hours) and dynamic pain scores (first 6 hours). Further investigation is required to determine the optimal technique and local anesthetic admixture for periarticular local anesthetic infiltration.
NCT05087862.
本随机试验比较了行初次全髋关节置换术患者行关节囊周围神经阻滞和关节周围局部麻醉浸润的效果。我们假设,与关节囊周围神经阻滞相比,关节周围局部麻醉浸润可将术后 3 小时股四头肌无力的发生率降低 5 倍(即从 45%降至 9%)。
60 例行椎管内麻醉下初次全髋关节置换术的患者被随机分配至接受关节囊周围神经阻滞组(n=30),使用 20 mL 含肾上腺素的布比卡因 0.50%;或接受关节周围局部麻醉浸润组(n=30),使用 60 mL 含肾上腺素的布比卡因 0.25%。两组均接受 30 mg 酮咯酸静脉注射(关节囊周围神经阻滞组)或关节周围注射(关节周围局部麻醉浸润组),以及 4 mg 静脉注射地塞米松。术后,由一名盲法评估者在 3、6 和 24 小时进行感觉评估和运动评估(伸膝和髋关节内收)。此外,盲法观察者还在 3、6、12、18、24、36 和 48 小时记录静息和动态疼痛评分;首次使用阿片类药物的时间;24 小时和 48 小时累积突破性吗啡消耗量;阿片类药物相关副作用;6、24 和 48 小时行物理治疗的能力;以及住院时间。
关节囊周围神经阻滞组和关节周围局部麻醉浸润组在 3 小时时股四头肌无力的发生率无差异(20% vs 33%;p=0.469)。此外,在其他时间间隔的感觉阻滞或运动阻滞、首次使用阿片类药物的时间、累积突破性吗啡消耗量、阿片类药物相关副作用、行物理治疗的能力以及住院时间方面,两组间无差异。与关节囊周围神经阻滞组相比,关节周围局部麻醉浸润组的静息疼痛评分(所有测量时间间隔)和动态疼痛评分(3 小时和 6 小时)更低。
对于初次全髋关节置换术,关节囊周围神经阻滞和关节周围局部麻醉浸润导致的股四头肌无力发生率相当。然而,关节周围局部麻醉浸润与更低的静息疼痛评分(尤其是在最初 24 小时)和动态疼痛评分(最初 6 小时)相关。需要进一步研究来确定关节周围局部麻醉浸润的最佳技术和局部麻醉混合物。
NCT05087862。